all 9 comments

[–]djhdlkguhaeil 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The bit I find funniest is their framing of qanon. I don't think it's too outlandish to say there are likely a few Jimmy saville types in government and the media. The reaction against that possibility, to denigrate and reprimand anyone interested in finding out only makes things seem more suspicious

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm skeptical it was created in a lab, but I think it's very plausible that it escaped from a lab where it was being researched.

[–]RM-Goetbbels 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Did NPR just flash a "support Independent Journalism" ad at me? LOL! The nerve of this biased and lying news media whore org.

NPR is partially tax funded because of something or another, I've forgotten now and don't really care anyway, and has continually been labelled as a biased news org. Just google "defund NPR" if your interested.

Disclosure about the poll. Some pretty interesting insights if you read the criteria they used beyond the obvious ones I'm posting:

About the Study These are some of the findings of an Ipsos poll conducted between December 21-22, 2020, on behalf of NPR. For this survey, a sample of 1,115 adults age 18+ from the continental U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii was interviewed online in English with oversamples of Black and Hispanic Americans. This poll is trended against NPR/Ipsos polls conducted between August 20-21, 2020, July 30-31, 2020, and June 19-20, 2018, with a sample of 1,186, 1,115 and 1,071 U.S. adults, respectively

.............

and does not rely on a population frame in the traditional sense. Ipsos uses fixed sample targets, unique to each study, in drawing a sample. After a sample has been obtained from the Ipsos panel, Ipsos calibrates respondent characteristics to be representative of the U.S. Population using standard procedures such as raking-ratio adjustments

and that ladies and gentlemen is why you don't allow a poll of "1,115 U.S. adults conducted December 21-22" from a biased source to influence your opinion. It's a shell game, watch the pea! Round and round she goes where it stops no one knows.........except the dealer. The dealer always knows.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

The Coco wasn't made in a lab.

It's the flu.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It is both.

China's problem began and ended in wuhan.

There is no superbug. It's a hoax in the most literal sense.

It's the flu.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The virus is designed to attack fatties and Muslims. Wuhan doesn't have a lot of either. Most other east Asian countries are the same so haven't had many cases no matter the government reaction.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The virus is designed to attack fatties and Muslims.

There is no new virus.

It's the regular old flu.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm 95% with you. There's so much "scientific evidence" about this stuff, obviously most of it is propaganda, but there's a lot of it being presented by IMO "trusted" skeptical sources like Ben Swann, etc etc etc. Perhaps they're like atheists trying to verify or make sense of historical events and claims in the bible.

What NONE of them do is drill down to the FUNDAMENTAL definitions of what is being "tested" to actually clearly define what COVID-19 is alleged to be. If we can't isolate what their proprietary tests are for (not just with 35+ cycles, etc) or discover what's actually in the vaccines, then regardless if there's any COVID or not, it's obviously all blind faith scientism and a giant scam base on privatized secret info.

Also, I think some bio-weapons are being created and released - and now that the definitions of a COVID death are so loose anything can be blamed on it. Including their poisons.