all 43 comments

[–]aureolin 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

also deceived into thinking murdering your own child is empowering. what the actual...

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Haha fetuses go byebye :)

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (10 children)

POV: you're childless mid-30s coomer focusing on vidya games and cuck porn. Imagine chosing this over a wife and children.

:)

[–]Chipit[S] 8 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 8 fun -  (4 children)

Whataboutism is such a feminist response. Complete failure to address the topic at hand, because there isn't any answer. Instead, change the topic to WE HATE MEN.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

But im not even feminist and I certainly don't hate men.

Just calm down, my friend. Such an aggresive response, tsk tsk.

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

I said it was a feminist response, not that you are a feminist.

Changing the subject away from women is a classic feminist response. WE HATE MEN is also one.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Well, you guys seems to extremally hate women so no suprise that feminists just return your hatred back to you.

Just saying.

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's not hate to point out that women are making terrible choices that will turn out badly for them once they age out of their childbearing years. They're headed for massive regret. You're the one who brought hatred for men into it because you had no reply. There isn't any reply. It's just fucking sad.

[–]asterias 7 insightful - 7 fun7 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 7 fun -  (4 children)

Most of those men ended up this way because of women who will accept "only the best" and chase after the 20% of men.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

The issue is that 50% or more of men are now unmarriageable.

Why do you think poor useless women end up with 6 kids by 7 different fathers?

They have low standards, fuck around and find out.

25% of young men now identity as LGBT. 2% of men are gay so that's 23% of young men with a nasty fetish of some kind.

[–]asterias 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Why do you think poor useless women end up with 6 kids by 7 different fathers?

Because of riding the cock carousel while ignoring decent men?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Literally... and condoms are superfluous for them obviously...

[–]Verdantfuppe 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I mean.. i get if some just wants to focus on their career. But the overall line of thought that it should be the standard, is why so many, especially women, end up lonely and quite honestly, miserable.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Smarterthanlastweek2 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    No man with a 100k + job a year wants a 30 year old with a 50+ body count.

    By the time a woman's had about 21 past lovers there's about a 50% chance she'll cheat once married: https://archive.ph/SDVEU

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      Jeezus Christ on a crutch. Just fucking shower once a year or something and you'll double your chances of getting laid, snowflake boy.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        This is the stereotypical response from a cuck.

        So says the pure gamma.

        Come back and talk to me when you rise up to beta.

        [–]Drewski 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

        18 years of child raising is a huge responsibility. Being a parent is not for everyone.

        [–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

        Sure it is. All humans throughout history form families and have children. It's the most natural thing in the world. NOT doing it is abnormal.

        [–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

        It's the most natural thing in the world.

        So is being riddled with parasites, dying young, incest, disfiguring skin diseases, cancer, and being ignorant as fuck. "Natural" is over-rated.

        NOT doing it is abnormal.

        Abnormal like medical care, clothes, hygiene, living past 40, reading and writing, and a secure food supply.

        [–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

        There's a name for the logical fallacy you just used, but I can't recall it at the moment.

        I'm more than a little surprised at all the people who were triggered by this post and came out of the woodwork to defend sterility. But that's the reality of paid posters on the internet these days.

        [–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        There's a name for the logical fallacy you just used, but I can't recall it at the moment.

        /head-desk

        Its the naturalistic fallacy, and it's not me that fell for it. It's the foolish idea that just because something is "natural" it must be good.

        There are some natural things which are good, some are conditionally good, some are neutral, and many are bad.

        [–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Having children is not bad. It's good.

        No fallacy here.

        Are you a mid-30s unmarried childless woman who has hit the wall? I'm more than a little surprised at something this uncontroversial being pushed back against so hard. The thing to do now is embrace being a wine aunt and be a cautionary example to your nieces.

        [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Go back to reddit degenerate cuck

        [–]IkeConn 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

        Not even Chads will fuck them.

        [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

        Well actually.....yes, they do.

        Did you ever hear about Cougars and cubs? Basically post wall ladies dating and casual sexing with young, attractive studs. It's fucking nuts and gross but it happens.

        [–]jet199 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        Chads get sick of the starfish eventually.

        Also fucking jo momma is always their thing.

        [–]In-the-clouds 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Those women were deceived into chasing after the world instead of pursuing real love.

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Feminist brainwashing.

        I have nothing against freedom for women. But the problem lies with the indoctrination that a career is so much more important than "domestic drudgery" when in fact, it is not, by a HUGE LONG shot.

        The traditional moral man SACRIFICES most of his lifetime for a career in corporate drudgery in order to support wife and children, GIFTING his cherished treasure of family with the ability to stay home and grow up together. This has been and remains the heart of the traditional, moral man. Opening the door for his woman is a gesture which embodies it well: he isn't calling her incapable of opening the door, he is DOING WORK so that SHE DOES NOT HAVE TO.

        But no, brainwashing came, first with the sufragettes who were taught that smoking like a man was cool (because the cigarette makers would make a lot more money) and after that success, it was only a matter of time until the powers that shouldn't be could find a way to make women prefer work and sending their babies to indoctrination camps instead of raising a family the proper way.

        [–]jet199 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

        Because husbands just turn up in your life every day.

        [–]TarBaby 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

        I'm a pussy pirate, my name is Captain Jack Sparrow, take off my pants and you can see my flesh arrow!

        [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        You are a u/niggerboy

        [–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        Couldn't bother to finish making your meme?

        [–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        No cuck

        [–]kaspiane 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

        Women throughout history did not have the right to own property, vote, or represent their interests in government. By necessity, they were forced to attach themselves to a husband in order to secure resources. Now that women have the option to choose, and overwhelmingly educated women choose to work and have children later in life. I don't view this as being a bad thing in and of itself.

        Women are hypergamous because it allows them to better secure the security of their children and improve the next generation. Women who have low standards are always figures of ridicule. If you had a daughter, you wouldn't be pleased to learn she was attaching herself to unemployed, criminal, scumbag men.

        The issue really is that we've reached a point where many men are unable to provide enough benefits to women such that they are interested in building a family with them. The solution to this is NOT to send our species backward by encouraging women to once again return to domestic drudgery (which many women throughout history have NOT wanted to do despite what you say). I view the inevitable population drop as a good thing - quality over quantity. I only want the best of the best to have children and pass on their genes. You can't really think its a positive thing that Ms Mediocre decides to quit her job to eke out a meagre existence on Mr Coomer's dime, do you? I'd rather they both just work until they drop dead and only the truly exceptional people get to have children (a privilege, not a right).

        [–]Chipit[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        Men hate and eugenics. Boy, really scraping the bottom of the barrel to try to fight this one, eh?

        [–]kaspiane 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        You sound like the SJWs who call all criticism of identity politics 'bigotry'. Pointing out that women are hypergamous by nature isn't hatred. If you think this behaviour is eugenics, then you might as well call all sexual preferences eugenics, too.

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

        "Domestic drudgery" oh the ignominy of raising children. Yeah, much better to let the State tell them what to think.

        I hope you will never have any.

        [–]kaspiane 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        But that's exactly the point, women who don't want kids shouldn't have any. You agree with this, but you also hate them for it. Why? If you want kids, go have them, and leave those who don't want them alone.

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Wait, you think the ideas in your head are your own?

        [–]asterias 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

        If you had a daughter, you wouldn't be pleased to learn she was attaching herself to unemployed, criminal, scumbag men.

        You confuse unemployment with being a criminal and a scumbag. Perhaps you are not aware that there are places, even in Europe, with really massive unemployment rates due to deep corruption of the society and the state. And this corruption actually favours women who will happily twerk their ass or suck some cock so that they can take a job that otherwise a decent man might hold. Not to mention various legislative measures that favour women.

        As for the "criminal and scumbag" part, criminals and scumbags rarely complain that they can't get a gf.

        Women are hypergamous because it allows them to better secure the security of their children and improve the next generation.

        Getting pregnant with some low IQ scumbag and trying to find a sucker to raise someone else's bastard doesn't sound like any improvement at all.

        [–]kaspiane 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        I'm not American, first of all. I'm not confusing unemployment with being a criminal or a scumbag. These are three different circumstances which nonetheless would be dealbreakers for the majority of women, and men who want good outcomes for their daughters.

        " And this corruption actually favours women who will happily twerk their ass or suck some cock so that they can take a job that otherwise a decent man might hold. Not to mention various legislative measures that favour women." < Simply nonsense. Who are these women, and what are the jobs which are being taken?

        "As for the "criminal and scumbag" part, criminals and scumbags rarely complain that they can't get a gf.

        Criminals and scumbags like Elliot Rodger sure complained about not getting a girlfriend.

        You guys are so contradictory - one one hand, complaining that women's standards are too high, and that's what is causing the downfall of civilisation, and on the other, complaining that women en masse have low standards and that's what's causing the downfall of civilisation.

        [–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        What I wrote was pretty clear. Being unemployed doesn't make you a scumbag and real scumbags rarely complain that they can't get a gf. It's your definition of a scumbag that is different.

        You ask who are these woman that suck a cock to get a job, do you want a list with names and job titles and SSN?

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Very well said , sister. Thank you.