you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (36 children)

No, they tried to destroy all the evidence, but failed. And they didn't "let" millions survive, they failed to kill them all.

The Nazis weren't superhuman god-like beings. They were people, often working at cross-purposes or with agendas of their own, struggling with the logistics of mass murder in the middle of a war where by 1943 they were being defeated.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (35 children)

They failed to kill them? Like these "holocaust survivors"?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/VJ0jeyN1jdBs/

Too much soccer, beer, whore houses, swimming pools and delivering over 2,000 jewish babies must've gotten in the way of their "genocide". Why would they do all these things for jews when they were just killing them all?

Answer: because they weren't killing them all. If Germany wanted to kill all the jews in Europe then that's exactly what they would've done.

But you choose to believe people like this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Rosenblat

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Those places were used for the guards but let me ask you this.Let's say what you said is correct and hitler gave the jews all of this, why do you worship hitler for giving people who you claim to be"satanic monsters who want to genocide the white race and rule the world"a life of luxury?Hitler"Yes i know you jews destroyed germany, and want to exterminate all white people to conquerer the world.So instead of treating you monsters like shit, here's a camp where you get treated better than the german people.Have fun!"Like do you not see how that makes it sound like jews weren't actually a big threat and the monsters hitler and the nazis made them out to be?

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I don't worship Hitler or anyone else. It's obvious he was correct about the jews. Why did he treat them well in camps? Because Germans are good people and just wanted them to leave. They delivered thousands of jewish babies in those camps despite being involved in a world war! Why would they waste the time, money and resources on delivering babies for people they were allegedly just going to murder anyways? The answer is because they weren't going to kill all of them, the Germans wanted the jews to leave Germany.

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So jews weren't monsters then because if someone wants to straight up kill you,and have tried it in the past to others(like russia),and kicked out 109 times then you kill them in self defense before they kill you.Hitler allowed jews to breed like rabbits and thus increased their numbers so they can create more jews to genocide white people.Sounds like a fucking pushover if you ask me.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Maybe he and the rest of the nat soc Germans just weren't the monsters that you've been told. Why would they deliver thousands of jew babies if they were just going to kill them all? They weren't and just wanted them to leave Germany.

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Even if hitler and nazis didn't do the holocaust, how does starting a war with all of europe make hitler and the nazis good?Hitler"Yes i'm trying to save you all by declaring war on neutral countries and getting millions of europeans killed to safely get rid of jews."Buddy no matter how you look at it, hitler and the nazis weren't the good guys.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Germany didn't start a war with all of Europe. They invaded Poland after the Russians already went in and began slaughtering poles. The karyn massacre was blamed on Germany until 1990 when the Russians admitted they did it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre

Another jew lie from this period...probably just another cohencidence.

After Germany invaded Poland both England and France decided to declare war on Germany but not the communist russians. Hitler constantly sent peace talks to England and Churchill turned everyone of them down on orders from his jew masters.

If Germans weren't the good guys than neither were the jews. The same people forcing all this lgbt crap that you love so much.

I'm going to start a thread soon showing all the perverted bullshit the jews were doing in Germany during the Weimar republic before Hitler came to power. Maybe that will open your eyes to what's currently happening with the LGBT crap.

[–]jacques1102 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Germany did invade first and they split poland in half with the soviets.(funny how hitler believed the ussr was run by jews but teamed up with them for a while.)Also i dont know of any historian who thinks the nazi did that.Wouldn't you think that if jews control the history that they would of spread a lie about it and most historians would believe the nazis did the Katyn massacre?Hitler's peace talks were a fucking joke my dude.It basically boiled down to"Give me everything i want or i'll continue the war."As for why the allies didn't declare war on the soviets. The Western alliance with Poland specified a defense against Germany. And public opinion was not clearly against the Soviets. It wasn't understood until the Nuremberg trials whether the Soviets and Germans had a deal or not, it was often believed that the Soviets moved independently and that it was justified. When the Polish Army moved into Ukrainian-majority territory in 1919 and began occupying it, Western mediators tried to get the Poles to go back. Likewise the following year when the Polish Army was fighting the Red Army. There was a proposal put forward by Lord Curzon, the Curzon Line, to end the war at that border line, which closely tracks the ethnic majority line. The Poles ended up pushing the Red Army much further east and annexed much of Belarus and Ukraine. There was a widespread view that Poland shouldn't have been occupying the land east of the Curzon Line, and when the Soviets took it back in 1939 it wasn't universally considered an affront. The Bialystok region is the only part of Poland that the Soviets occupied in 1939 that was west of the Curzon Line and the only part that was majority Polish, and Bialystok was returned to Poland in 1945.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

They failed to kill them? Like these "holocaust survivors"?

Well obviously if they are still alive to tell their stories, then yes, they are Holocaust survivors who the Nazis failed to kill. Or did you think they were zombies risen from the grave? 🙄

For somebody with such strong opinions about the Holocaust, you sure as hell don't know very much about it.

The Nazi party was in power from 1933 to 1945. That's twelve years in case you can't count. Things can and did change a lot in 12 years, and conditions varied hugely over that time. The Nazis built literally thousands of concentration and labour camps which varied greatly in their conditions depending on the purpose of the camp, who was in charge, and who the prisoners were.

  • Some camps, intended for citizens of foreign powers that Germany did not want to offend, had relatively good living conditions.
  • Theresienstadt was designed as a "model village" to deceive the Swiss Red Cross that prisoners in the concentration camps were being treated well.
  • Camps with only Jews or Slavs were usually harsher than those with mixed populations.
  • Camps designed for long-term imprisonment sometimes gave prisoners little luxuries to encourage compliant behaviour.
  • Extermination camps did not since few people lived more than a few hours.
  • There were only five extermination camps, where almost all the prisoners were murdered immediately on arrival, and they only ran for 18 months or so before the Nazis, worried that they were going to lose the war, shut them down and attempted to destroy the evidence.
  • Most labour camps were intended to work the slave labour to death with hard physical labour on starvation rations, but a few had lighter duties and more survivors.
  • Auschwitz was a complex of at least 40 individual camps, which varied greatly in their conditions.

The original concentration camp at Auschwitz was a former Polish army barracks consisted of permanent brick buildings. It held about 7000 prisoners. The extermination camp built at Auschwitz-Birkenau was very different. About a million prisoners went to Auschwitz-Birkenau and were murdered almost the moment they arrived. The third major camp at Auschwitz was the Monowitz labour camp, and it was used for slave labour for IG Farben. In order to increase productivity (very low due to the starvation rations) the camp set up a brothel that good workers could visit, and paid the workers a pittance that they could use to buy luxuries like cigarettes. The other smaller subcamps ranged in size from Kattowitz, which was run by the Gestapo and held ten prisoners, to Neu-Dachs which held about 3,500 prisoners.

In general, camps in occupied Poland were harsher than those in Germany. Conditions before the war started were generally not as harsh as during the war. Camps run by true-believer Nazi anti-Semites were much worse than those run by moderate commandants.

But you choose to believe people like this [Herman Rosenblat]

Why do you say that? Have I ever quoted Rosenblat? Nothing I have said relates to Rosenblat's fiction. He wrote a fictional romance set in a concentration camp and claimed that it was autobiographical. A foolish and stupid lie, but it wasn't Denialists who discovered the lie.

Quote: "Jewish professor Deborah Lipstadt had already denounced the story in her personal blog in December 2007. Other Holocaust survivors like Peter Kubicek also denounced the implausibility of the story. Jewish-American blogger Danny Bloom started emailing several historians for help, one of them being Holocaust historian Kenneth Waltzer."

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

I'm not reading all that bullshit. They failed to kill millions of people since there's millions of "survivors"...in fact NEW survivors pop up everyday.

Why would they deliver thousands of jew babies if they were just going to murder them all?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

I'm not reading all that

That explains why you are so ignorant and small-minded.

Sometimes, when I mock dumbass Holocaust Deniers like you, I feel bad. I think "Maybe they're just uninformed. They do make a good point that the average person's understanding of the Holocaust is far from the reality. Maybe I shouldn't mock them, I should engage with them in discussion." And then drooling apes like you remind me that, no, the Deniers are not just dumber than dog shit, they are wilfully dumber than dog shit, refusing to educate themselves even when given the chance.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

6 million dead (allegedly) yet you can't find any physical evidence to prove your point...

Hilarious

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

you can't find any physical evidence

Apart from the millions of corpses, the burn pits, the ashes containing human bones, the eyewitnesses, the confessions, the written records, the mass graves. So if you ignore the tens of thousands of pages of evidence, there is no evidence at all.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Show me the bodies with proof of how they died then.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Show me the bodies with proof of how they died then.

Dude, I know you're getting off wanking over photos of Jewish corpses from the camps. You can find your own porn.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Yeah, you believe in something despite no proof other than words...

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

https://www.saidit.net/s/Whatdidthejewsdo/comments/b2oz/an_older_but_very_relevant_interview_given_the/

Why is that jew cunt admitting jews are the reason for the immigration problem in Europe?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think you linked to the wrong video. There was nothing in that "admitting jews are the reason for the immigration problem in Europe".

You hallucinating again? You ought to see a doctor about that.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The fucking jew cunt said Europe hasn't learned to be multicultural and that her people are largely responsible for it!

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Show me some proof then.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Show me some proof then.

Why? You will just refuse to read it.

[–]Oyveygoyim[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol you don't have proof that isn't words?