The FDA advisors who RAMMED through approval of the bivalent booster jabs are now, only now, realizing they have been conned and are acting all upset that people get MORE covid with this shot.

submitted by iamonlyoneman from 12ft.io

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]StillLessons 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Corruption is a complex word.

These are people first, and only second doctors. Just like the general population, doctors have serious emotional hacks, very easily manipulated by those interested in doing so.

My point is that the "corruption" of these doctors is very thorough, not just in the sense of "pay them for their opinion" (though this also exists, without a doubt), but that they are literally incapable of perceiving an objective enough perspective to trigger the necessary skepticism for honest science. They are surrounded by their equally corrupt friends, they develop group-think (e.g. Albert Bourla is a friend of mine... I'm sure they did good work...) and just rubber stamp whatever the fuck comes across their desk. They are equally prone to depression and anxiety (actually moreso than the general population).

The myth of "medical experts" as a cultish, slavish group to follow ends NOW.

Their weak human nature - fed by the vapid culture idolizing them - has created a monster which many are still too asleep to recognize, even as it is fully out from under the bed and acting in broad daylight. The medical establishment is proving itself radically, lethally incompetent / evil (some of each).

It's going to take decades to build a cadre of good physicians after this. We haven't even begun to clean out the dead wood yet...

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The dead wood has cleaned itself out. They keep getting the jabbyboosties and they're going to die in the next few years.

which is problematic for lots of reasons but this is the only remaining nonsense that the conspiracy nutters from 2020 said which hasn't come true yet so

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Are the illegal immigrants vaccinated? That "dead wood" you speak of, are your fellow countrymen.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

and then?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And then you asked the most retarded Question in the known universe, thinking it meant something.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Despite these imperfections, the data was included in a preprint study that was posted online in June, again in September in an FDA document and then later that month in a top medical journal – and advisers to the FDA and the CDC said the data should have been shared with them, too.

So . . . only trust the company that stands to get a brazillion dollars' profit, when they give you the rosy-numbers presentation? Cool.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

an FDA spokesman, told CNN in an email that “the FDA received the preprint less than a day prior to the advisory committee meeting,” and “the information was therefore not provided in an adequate timeframe for it to be included in the agency’s meeting materials, and generally the FDA only discusses data at advisory committee meetings that the agency has had the opportunity to substantively review.”

No SIR. They can NOT be expected to review a paper in one day. It's not reasonable.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Then they had no choice. They should have advised against. This isn't hard to understand. They were derelict in their duty to reject a recommendation.

[–]jagworms 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even so, they approved it, knowing they hadn't read it. They can't really complain that they were tricked, unless there was unseen pressure on them to approve it, when it was plain to see they were unprepared to do so.

[–]Bigs 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://substack.com/inbox/post/96149947 Igor sums it up nicely I think

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They weren't 'conned'. They knew it was an mRNA treatment and not a vaccine. Those are deadly, and failed all earlier trials. Best case, these advisors were willfully ignorant, and are culpable for their actions.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice title. Shame if it were corrected. Or submitted to the correct sub.

The FDA Advisors Who Rammed Through Approval of the Bivalent Booster, Are Acting Upset That People Who Took This Shot Are More Susceptible to COVID Despite Putting No Thought to the Ramification of DNA Altering mRNA Injections