Not really. This seems like a red herring to me. They don't have a critical stake in this either way and likely play both sides, wanting to be SEEN as fighting climate change for PR purposes and because some of their Muslim enemies(and Russia) rely on fossil fuel profits for global clout, influence and military spending, but understanding that going too far could also hurt much of their near term wealth.

It's important not to recklessly blame Jews for things that are far fetched or don't make sense, and Jewish shills will of course aid in this and then highlight it in order to discredit critics. There is so much we know for sure they are largely responsible for, and for which a strong case can be made if not outright proven that there's no reason to add endless new conspiracies that only serve to muddy the waters and delegitimize accurate and provable criticism of them.

Traditionally it has primarily been big oil that funds climate change denial. I have to admit I haven't kept up on who owns what in terms of fossil fuel driven companies these days, but in the past it hasn't been something Jews dominated. Maybe that has changed in recent times as Jews seem to own just about everything of importance thanks to the massive transfer of wealth to Jewish hands starting during the Reagan years and accelerating massively under Bush Jr, but fossil fuels are a risky business because of the horrible optics, long term global damage they cause, and inevitably vanishing reserves, and Jews normally play the long game on things. I could be wrong and they could have a lot of hidden hands in fossil fuels, but if that's the case research it and then prove it, don't just blindly speculate.