If you took the Covid-19 clot shot you can check and see if you're going to die with this handy site

submitted by send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]shilldetector 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Answer me this. Do you honestly think someone who had the vaccine a year ago is at a greater risk of blood clots, or other complications, than someone who had actually got covid once or twice in that time?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Absolutely. Depending on the lot they received.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

You should take this with a gran of salt. While I am anti vax myself and while it does seem likely that they used different lot numbers to test different versions etc, another explanation is that different lot numbers were distributed to different populations with different underlying risk scores.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

It's not just clotting and heart damage from clotting. Pfizer and the other big pharma companies lied about spike proteins. They said something along the line of the spikes are non toxic and spikes would stay in the injection site and that your immune system would simply interact with them and 'learn' to make a robust safe defense to covid. That was a lie. Your body starts becoming a spike factory. These spikes move through the entire body. They fuck up your blood vessels, collect in all you organs, especially the spleen and reproductive organs. A recent study showed another confirmation that covid vaccines weaken your immune system over time. Similar to the AIDS virus.

8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35659687/

One thing we know about these satanists running our western governments is that they profiteer (especially using positions of public trust). This vax campaign is going to make people sicker and more reliant on the over priced medical system. More government contracts for future vaccines will be called for. People that have taken it are on a path to outsourcing their immune system to greedy merchants that don't care about their health. After x number of 'software upgrades' you won't be able to go back to using your own immune system. You will be like a domesticated cow or chicken that will die without constant injections. Which from a population control perspective is ideal.

another explanation is that different lot numbers were distributed to different populations with different underlying risk scores.

You sound like my boomer parents that sit and let CNN lie to them for decades and then when there's a new news story they assume good faith. Why should we assume good faith in ANYTHING big pharma tells us? I assume bad faith. Stop trying to hold on to the fantasy that these institutions aren't captured by people that hate us deeply. You have to get over that hump. Besides, Michael Yeadon went over this on a stream over a year ago. He says the batches looked like testing of different products not variations of a safe vaccine to deal with risk scores, and Yeadon would know considering he was the former chief science officer for Pfizer.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You misunderstand my intent with my comment. I am anti vax and do not assume good faith at all, and when I am trying to convince others of being anti vax, I use similar talking points as you. However while amongst peers, like you, where it is already an established fact that they are evil, we can consider alternative explanations too, because we know that doing so does not change the greater picture of what they are doing.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

we can consider alternative explanations too,

I'm fine with considering alternative explanations. Obviously the truth will win. Any anti vax position I share is open to criticism and I want criticism. I want to be shown to be wrong if I'm wrong. However, it seems to me you're trying to find evidence of these problems just being happy accidents. Everything I've seen points towards malice.

because we know that doing so does not change the greater picture of what they are doing.

This is true....

But, we need to be careful as whites. It's really easy for us to trust authority. We are not biologically adapted to being lied too by those in authority. We don't not have good people in authority positions right now. We need to do everything in our power to fight our natural high trust nature until order is restored.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35659687/

Didn't they prioritize boosting immunosuppressed groups i.e. the elderly, cancer patients, etc.?

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I think there are several studies out of lancet showing the wanning. I haven't read them all. This one seemed to control for immunosuppressed groups.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35813279/

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There's no non-vax control here for comparison.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not sure which study Yamamoto is referencing. It's probably one of these:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=effectiveness+of+COVID-19+vaccines+and+the+waning+of+immunity+with+time+lancet&filter=years.2022-2022&sort=date

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

found the full paper

https://patriots.win/p/15IrBbr0ye/x/c/4Ob8KOWDdCP

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Compared with unvaccinated individuals, vaccinated individuals more often had homemaker service, were more often born in Sweden, had more comorbidities, and had a higher level of education at baseline (p<0·001 for all; table 1). Similar differences were evident between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the different vaccine subcohorts.

Translation: people that got boosted were, on average, older and had poorer health to begin with. That's why they got boosted.