A possible theory about how the left has been able to dominate cultural, social and academic sectors

submitted by Nasser from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I think this is really civilian focused and America-centric. In Europe our fraternities were right wing in universities, the militaries were filled with aristocrats etc. These institutions aren't 'naturally' liberal, they were engineered that way from being naturally Traditionalist.

When you look at all the fields of academia that are today associated with the worst, most nonsensical, type of libtardism you find that these were all founded by and dominated by right wingers. Everything to do with social studies (blood) and environmentalism (soil), and the entire humanities and Culture endeavours.

These things aren't anti-transcendence at all, the institutions just started discriminating against those that naturally belong there and replaced them with people who don't belong there but will create system propaganda thus we end up in upside-down world.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Yes, it was the same all throughout Europe. Students were the forefront of the revolutionary movements, the Legionaries in particular were started as a student group by Codreanu as opposed to both Germany and Italy being political parties that attracted a lot of students.

    The post-war drastic and rapid evolution of the university system was part of the general postmodernisation of society intended to engineer every pro-social factor out of society in order that mass movements never rise up again.

    Baudrillard wrote that the massification of society necessarily dissolves the social but I think during the modern interwar period this was proven wrong when massification kept the social which led to heights of social capital and the eventual pro-social nationalist revolutions. But he is right that conscious postmodernisation which is allowed by highly technological societies definitely can and have erased the social to a remarkable degree.

    [–]FriedrichLudwig 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Baudrillard wrote that the massification of society necessarily dissolves the social

    Is that like what the behavioral sink/mouse utopia demonstrates? That when all available social "slots" have been filled, or when a society has more people than it needs to function, pro-social behaviors begin to decline, eventually leading to societal collapse?

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Seems similar at least