you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Never heard of him and doubt he's a white nationalist and in the next paragraph he specifically states that the proposed gun law is to prevent guns getting in the hands of Hispanic and black gangs. Try again. You said you'd seen many wn's say this.

Edit: looked him up and yeah I vaguely recognise him I think. Guy who says things about the holocaust and has been running for decades and getting a dozen votes each time. How exactly is this guy a good representative of mainstream wn thought?

[–]EdLimonovFan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

sees obvious proof that OP is correct

does mental gymnastics to make it seem somehow irrelevant

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No I see one fringe kook who wants to keep guns out of the hands of blacks and Mexicans in his own words so in fact you've disproven your own OP yourself. It is not a WN position to put poor white people in jail for owning guns.

[–]EdLimonovFan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Is everyone who you think reflects badly on the movement, suddenly a fringe kook?

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He doesn't reflect badly imo his positions are pretty sound -- including his entirely justified gun control measures designed IN HIS OWN WORDS to keep guns out of the hands of black and Mexican gangs -- but he's still a fringe figure that most WN's have likely never heard of. 'Kook' may have been a bit too harsh though.