The Dissident Right/WN obsesses too much over race-mixing. It's really not that big of a deal, IMO.

submitted by AltAlt from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Funny way of saying "I can't refute a single thing you said."

I know you're responding in bad faith but I'm gonna address these anyway:

supports fags

I've never supported them. You're confusing me with someone else.

and multiculturalism

Only to the extent in the US where we've already become multicultural. Even then, I still advocate the white population increase and criminals as well as low IQ minorities be sent elsewhere. I've stated many times Europe should remain white only.

[–]EuropeanAwakening14 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You don't get to choose the genes you get when you race mix. You have no way of knowing that a future mixed population would be better than the 2 current populations. There's nothing Europeans need that we would get from having 90 IQ mulatto children. Race mixed populations just become another burden for the majority.

[–]SoylentCapitalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You don't get to choose the genes you get when you race mix.

You're not understanding evolution chooses the best genes from them while having a bigger gene pool to choose from. We're also talking about it from a large scale perspective. The Neanderthal example should've already made you realize this. It's why the discussion is on the long-term effect.

There's nothing Europeans need that we would get from having 90 IQ mulatto children.

The mean between black and white IQ is 92.5 which is what mulatto's would be expected to have. The Eyferth study showed male mulatto's have 97 IQ on average. The hereditarian Arthur Jensen stated heterosis may have contributed to that.

The best criticism is that the individuals in the study were young and since IQ has lower heritability at that age it altered the children's scores, however the white boys still had an average IQ of 101 in this study. It is still plausible heterosis, which is demonstrated in nature in other species, made the dysgenic difference less than what was to be expected in the short-term.

Jensen suggests that heterosis may have enhanced the IQ level of the mixed race children in the study.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyferth_study

In addition, the source I gave earlier already described one example of something that can be contributed to future populations from Africans.

[–]WatchOutThere 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That would've been true then, but it isn't anymore. In our modern society, the most dysgenic of us are capable of having many children because they are coddled and protected. Survival of the fittest doesn't apply anymore. Bad genes stay in the gene pool.

http://imgur.com/a/ndqRU39

[–]SoylentCapitalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's fair. The best solution to make it still true would be to stop giving them government aid and launch eugenics programs.