Opinion: Nazi-supporters are anti-white

submitted by marc_gee from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Oh yeah you're right dude. All those bankers that the oligarchs of the capitalist empires like the Rothschilds, Schiffs, Warburgs etc that controlled the western states and funded the bolshevik revolution were all gentiles. The 80%+ soviet leadership being jews were all gentiles too. Churchill was definitely not a proto-neocon puppet for finance too, he was just acting entirely on his own accord. America is LOL, let's not even bother talking about how jewed America has always been. France though you might be right, although it's doubtful considering.

[–]ShiversRussia2017 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Churchill didn't come to power until after WW2 started.

Stalin purged the Jewish leadership of the Soviet union and it wasn't 80%. The Russian revolution was caused by the agitation of WW1 and consistent frustration with the autocratic tsarist regime.

If the US was controlled by Jews in the 30s, why did they reject a boat of Jewish refugees coming from Nazi Germany?Why did the KKK an anti semitic organisation have so much power aswell as an Anti semitic preacher?

If you look at the major banking in the banking in the US in the 1930s, you will see that Jews didn't have much power aswell as that, name one major media company in 1930s US that was Jewish run.

I'm not simping for Jews, I hate them just as much as you do but that is beyond delusional believing that.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Churchill didn't come to power until after WW2 started.

Yes Churchill didn't exist until he became prime minister, he simply spawned out of thin air at that very moment. Let's just ignore that Chamberlain didn't want the war and Churchill is openly credited and celebrated by the libtard establishment for being the one to get us into the war.

Stalin purged the Jewish leadership of the Soviet union and it wasn't 80%.

In the 50s, almost a decade after WW2 concluded.

If the US was controlled by Jews in the 30s, why did they reject a boat of Jewish refugees coming from Nazi Germany?Why did the KKK an anti semitic organisation have so much power aswell as an Anti semitic preacher?

Because being in power doesn't mean you have absolute power and can do whatever you want. There could have also been tactical reasons IE pushing for war. Also lol @ bringing up the KKK. Their leadership was a psyop from the start, no different to the Know Nothings. These protestant white supremacist organisations that mysteriously make white people hate Catholics and all the rest of it, crazy coincidence!!! The KKK was one of the major agitators against Germany too btw.

name one major media company in 1930s US that was Jewish run.

Umm... All of them? Fox: Jewish. MGM: Jewish. Warner Brothers: Jewish. RKO: Jewish. Paramount 2 out of 3 Jewish. The ONE founder of the 5 big media companies who wasn't jewish is called 'the founder of hollywood', so as usual the jews had their designated buttgoy frontman.

I'm not simping for Jews, I hate them just as much as you do but that is beyond delusional believing that.

Not really, you just haven't bothered to actually look into the JQ you just choose to hate them on principle.

[–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Prove these claims, you are making them in face against the current of history. It is up to you to provide sources to all of this.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I've noticed you never provide any sources to back up your claims yet demand others do. Why is that?

[–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Burden of proof is on them. Any source I do provide will just be dismissed as 'Jewish propaganda' no matter the content or maker.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When you make the claim that no big media companies were jewish when LITERALLY ALL 5 OF THEM WERE then we're probably right to assume you don't have the slightest fucking clue of what you're talking about

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

1) Churchill's war by David Irving, or yknow just listen to any libtard gleefully going on about how Chamberlain wanted to 'appease' the Germans and how heroic Churchill was for consistently war mongering against Germany for half a decade before Britain and France declared war.

2) The Doctor's plot was in the 50s, I don't know what to tell you man you either accept reality or you don't.

3) I haven't read a book on this I just made my own opinion based on the fact they fit the exact same pattern as other jew-led protestant anti-Catholic groups like the Know Nothings. It could just be a coincidence that they happen to be founded by a 33rd degree freemason and were functionally identical to jew-led orgs.

4) Literally google the big 5 media companies of the 30s. All 5 of them were founded by jews, as previously mentioned Paramount was 2 jews and 1 frontman buttgoy that they blame the founding of filth on.

Also obligatory you're a raging homosexual faggot

[–]ShiversRussia2017 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

No, saying "read books" and "google it" are not sources. In order to meet the burden of proof, you need to present an argument, and then link to a source that exactly addresses that argument clearly.