you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

Yeah you would have done much better in the same situation. You would have skillfully defeated the combined forces of literally the entire world through your big brain diplomacy. You would have taken the jews' power from them without a war because you're just so smart, they'd have had no choice but to give up their empires in France, Britain, America and Russia instead of just destroying you and killing 10s of millions of Europeans in the process.

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

This is my favourite thing in the world big brain geniuses sitting in their study 70 years after the fact and laughing about how 'fucking stupid' people were who were dealing with impossibly complex situations and near unlimited numbers of variables in real time with the benefit of hindsight. It's amazing to watch.

[–]marc_gee[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

dealing with impossibly complex situations and near unlimited numbers of variables

You are right that I have a simplistic view of world war 2, but do you think a truly pro-white government would have waged world war against millions of whites?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Yes. If 20 million Europeans need to die in another war for us to liberate Europe from jewry then of course. The alternative is our continued slavery, spiritual destitution and eventual genocide.

We are slaves that want our liberation. In order to get our liberation the slave master needs to be unseated from power, of course he will protect his power with his slave army. So you propose we just allow our slave master to continue ruling over us because some fellow slaves must die for the rest of the slaves to gain their freedom?

Obviously it's not desirable but what else can be done? ZOG is going to use white men as their slave army. We can either fight them or you can advocate their continued rulership over us with some nonsense rationalisation that somehow if a white person dies at the hands of Europe's liberators that delegitimises them and somehow makes Europe's slavemaster the good guy.

[–]antireddit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I'm not going to continue arguing about whether or not the Nazis were anyone to emulate or admire. I've already discussed this numerous times. We can agree to disagree.

What I will argue is this. Every minute you spend defending the Nazis and trying to convince people who've been indoctrinated into seeing them as the ultimate evil, is time you could use illustrating what is happening to us right now, and who is responsible for it. What Jews have done to the countries that fought against the Nazis is possibly the greatest betrayal in human history. You would be much better off pointing out this betrayal. Jews have used the power hitler's failed war gave them to discriminate against and incite hatred of whites in their own countries while flooding their countries with non european immigrants Jews themselves despise, in the countries that fought and died saving them from the Nazis(if the Jews own rhetoric is to be believed).

Jews have no excuse for this betrayal, and it doesnt take a long history lesson or lengthy discussions for people to be disgusted by it. Most of the men who fought against the Nazis would be classified as Nazis today thanks to Jewish rhetoric about "white supremacy" and nationalism. Trying to redeem the Nazis plays right into Jewish hands, as they can and have used it to cancel anyone who makes this argument. The key to winning is convincing whites that their treatment by Jews is bullshit and they dont have to accept it.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Every comment you make on saidit concern trolling people not to RESPOND to people posting nonsense about NS is time you could have spent doing literally anything else except being a raging homosexual

[–]antireddit 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

You have a strange definition of trolling, and I'm not just talking to you. In general when you bring up Nazis to anyone who isnt already red pilled, you just dug yourself a hole for no reason. Some of you need to step out of the wignat bubble and face reality. Its not about impressing people in some circle jerk.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

no one does this. this subreddit is filled with people who claim to be nationalists, against jewry, against finance and capitalism. pray tell why the people here SHOULDNT be educated on the one state in history that fought for everything they claim to believe in?

why shouldn't i correct people making uniformed statements? what ur doing is textbook concern trolling. u pretend that im walking up to people in the streets wearing a stahlhelm doing romans when i simply respond to someone who bring up ns.

if you unironically believe that discussing past nationalists amongst nationalists is the same as saying dumb shit to normies then you are incredibly stupid. this saidit page IS a 'circlejerk' of nationalists dummy of course we're going to treat it like one

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think you're thinking about the wrong guy, the one who always comments "Don't discuss Nazis you could get banned" is ShiversRussia2017

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

antireddit always replies to my comments doing it when i respond to someone else who brought them up first

[–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just to clarify I wasn't saying you yourself have a simplistic view of WW2 given I don't really know much of what you think I was more commenting on a broader trend of armchair generals and geniuses who know exactly what should have been done.

As for waging war on 'millions of whites' I never hear this same claim leveled at the allies who declared war on Germany and murdered hundreds of thousands of civilians after WW1 and WW2 -- millions is probably closer to the truth after WW2. Hitler waged war on Poland and the Czechs who were oppressing ethnic Germans and acting unreasonably and the country he mainly waged war on was the Soviet Union which already had killed 10 million or more White Christians owing to their bastard ideology -- well assisted by Jews of course in those killings. Who could argue that it was bad for any person to seek to wage war on the Soviet Union and wicked to ally with them? (Churchill you worthless drunk traitor I'm looking at you.)

The bottom line is his campaign wasn't for the destruction of Whites it was for the liberation of White people mainly from Jews.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

All potties did bahd dings; sometimes dey did good dings. Deer was a waw. Instigated by all pwaywers, some more so dan othas.

It was bad and the common peoples had to deal wit it.