Far Right Conspiracy Theorist Rick Wiles predicts Trump Administration is planning to execute Democrats and Media ‘Traitors’ (featured link)

submitted by Marginotions from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (13 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Marginotions[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

    right wing crackdown

    Please explain what this means? Guess I know what a right wing is, but who would be doing the cracking? Need another DCpill.

    [–][deleted]  (11 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Marginotions[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

      Sorry to seem so dim on this, but you seem to be saying right-wing persons actions will be counter-acted (cracked-down) by non-right-wing persons, and suggesting these non-r-w factions have authority to do some cracking (apprehending perpetrators of crack-downable actions), and going a bit farther on the assumption train of thought, these non-r-w crackers will get away with their crack-downs (non-violent conflict, or yes violent but non-r-w will triumph in the final round)? Have I got it yet?

      [–]literalotherkinNorm MacDonald Nationalism 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      Genuine question: Is English not your first language?

      [–]Marginotions[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

      u/DeepCrimsonPill writes: "Yo, based?/ Just kidding. Ain't gonna happen, and would result in a right wing crackdown the likes of which we've never seen."

      result in a right wing crackdown

      ... can be read 2 opposite ways.
      Setup: "right wing" n. name of political faction
      "crackdown" n. name of a process (intransitive group action)
      "right wing crackdown" n. name of transitive action with right wing as subject, because r-w describes what kind of crackdown.

      1 right way; r-w owns crackdown (object of possession) like a window 'owns' a pane ie, windowpane. IOW r-w is doing the crackdown (as suggested in title article), as a defensive response to legal failure opposing leftist coup to install a communist government to replace the legacy, Constitutional system. See also Dark Winter

      2 way left; unnamed faction (non-r-w) predicates "right wing crackdown" type of action as transitive, inversion of "right wing crackdown" to "crackdown on right wing" with r-w the object, crackdown 'owns' right-wing, its object.

      Me being traditional right-wing, iow despises communism, Zionists, non-whites who act against white interests, etc., preferred to interpret 1, but DeepCrimsonPill apparently (with most other commenters here) meant 2. This sub might be more truthfully named debatealtwhite, 'cause they don't care about communism, apparently.

      [–]SoylentCapitalist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      This is mental illness

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Looks more like schizophasia

        [–]SoylentCapitalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        You're overthinking a simple statement lol

        [–]Marginotions[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        More overthinking, demonstrated... please see my comment to u\literalotherkin, for brevity's sake.

        [–]WatchOutThere 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        No, I think you need to go a bit more in depth and then you'll get it

        [–]Marginotions[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Ok, got it. See (for sake of brevity) my in depth comment to u\literalotherkin.