you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CarlDungCrypto-fascist and eugenicist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I got 109. Idk if it was intentional, but I'm do not fully understand how the logic functions.

Sometimes the symbols were logical in the sense that they form up sequence of numbers which are logical just because they could have been represented in values. e.g:

"1 2 3,

4 5 6,

7 8 9,"

On the one hand, sometimes it felt like the symbols themselves create composition which has to be fulfilled or balanced in order the whole to be logical. e.g:

1 2 3,

3 2 1,

1 3 2

Which one is / was correct? I might have probably done better if I were aware of which this. I used both of these options while doing the test, depending on which just felt best at the moment.

[–]PRSanon 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Typically, they are organized into horizontal sets, you can see the pattern(s) in the top and middle set, then you fill in the bottom one by guessing and fulfilling the rules in the top and middle set.

Your

1 2 3

3 2 1

1 3 2

Works as a general rule, they are not typically related much vertically, but there are exceptions such as 38, which another comment goes over well.