Harvard offers course about healthcare for LGBTQIA+ 'infants'

submitted by Gaydolf_Titler from dailymail.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Heterosexuals recruit and molest, even though they don’t need to to flood the world with their parasitic degenerate ways. Guess what? Heterosexuality has been obsolete for the past 45 years since that’s when the first test tube baby was born. You no longer need to have sex to make babies. The cult of PIVrape is just that: a cult.

[–]Evola 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why do you have to pervert what is normal? Heterosexuality doesn't even need it's own word because it's just what people under normal circumstances go towards. What do you mean by heterosexual grooming in any case I think I might know what you're getting confused about?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it's just what people under normal circumstances go towards

It's far more than that, it is the only purpose of sexuality. Anything else is a fetish at best and a pathology if it obstructs normal procreation and family structure.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Heterosexuality is grooming. The two are mutually inclusive. If they weren’t, you would not need to demonize and oppress your Gay superiors.

[–]Evola 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, to state that heterosexuality is an acceptable sexuality implies that there are other acceptable states.

If you don't make that statement then people just default to what is normal.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Having babies via test tube is not a viable option for most people becasuse of the huge costs. Let alone having the 2.3 on average to sustain a population.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you can afford in vitro fertilization, then do it. If you can’t, then maybe having offspring is not for you.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's a retarded stance that is completely irrelevant to my point.