Was the real failure that C19 didn't kill as many as its designers hoped it would?

submitted by StillLessons from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]LarrySwinger2 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I think it was a multi-stage operation to a) shock the populace, b) clamp down on control, and c) reduce the population, but gently enough that, combined with systematic denial, people won't notice the cause or pattern. The stages are 1) an introduction of an intentionally developed coronavirus, and 2) mass jabbing. In other words: what we're seeing was the intended outcome.

The reason why I think everything was planned is because they've been developing coronaviruses for a long time, and because it appears that the media and policy responses had been ready since day 1. That indicates it's a PsyOp.

Shocking the populace was done to prepare them for 10-20 years of clamping down on control without them uniting to stop it. See The Shock Doctrine. They're pushing war, CBDCs, food shortages, etc. They also couldn't have performed a coup in the US without covid. Not just because mail-in ballots make fraud easier, but also because people would've been able to think more clearly.

The killing is part of a eugenic program. They just want to kill a few million of the weakest. It could also be that they're reducing the population more significantly by sterilizing people en masse, this remains to be seen.

[–]StillLessons[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Your approach is less melodramatic than mine. Kudos. If the purpose is greater control over the remaining population rather than large-scale population reduction, then I'll give them credit. They've achieved complete success. In my 50+ years on this ride, I never thought I would see people so slavishly obedient to absurd decrees from on high. The raw lack of common sense demonstrated by the crowd mouthing "each current thing" is stunning.

Next question: who are "they"? I'll offer a few names (forget groups, I prefer undeniably culpable individuals based on their records...): Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Anthony Fauci, Rachel Walensky, Francis Collins, Donald Trump, Joe Biden's handlers (he's a dementia patient, though he would have been on board were he still cognitively competent...). These are the obvious ones. I think it would be hard for anyone to argue these individuals did not know precisely what was going on. Does anyone have less heard of names we should know? The FDA folks, for example? I should know their names, but I confess I don't.

[–]Alphix 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All these people are beneath the trillionnaire class.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Next question: who are "they"?

You can find them on https://WikiSpooks.com.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly.

Further, if typical skeptics like us on SaidIt can see through their propaganda, collectively dig up research, find alternatives, share solutions, and completely destroy the official mono-narrative, then the "smart" people in charge should have been able to as well.

They simply didn't want it any other way.

[–]monkeymagic 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

spot on

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^