Plans of the Committee of 300 as of 1992 — Many are already complete or in the late stages

submitted by chottohen from self.conspiracy

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Gaydolf_Titler 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Not saying this isn't dead-on, or that Coleman's writing on Tavistock isn't mostly accurate, but according to Eustace Mullins, "Dr. John Coleman" was a fraud who lifted all his material from Mullins and Lyndon Larouche (and possibly the ADL), while claiming some sort of high-level intelligence connections (I believe he claimed he was former MI-6).

[–]chottohen[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. I'm just starting to read Coleman and have not heard any gossip about him. Gossip is the best part. I've seen a lot of Eustace Mullins vids and he is good. As for Lorouche, I had a colleague back in the nineties who was very interested in Larouche but was frustrated that Lyndon did not seem to fit on the usual left-right dichotomy that is so over-simplified as to be an outright lie, a trick. He never could pinhole Larouche. This is a long way to say I am just learning about Coleman and the Committee. I saw one long vid of him giving a speech for the puurpose of flogging his books I now see. I immediately bought this book. He may well have stolen the material but for me right now, it is fascinating. After this book I will look into Tavistock if you want to recommend something for me. Again thanks and cheers.

[–]chottohen[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think you and u/Canbot are asking: where is Israel in this plan? Right? Maybe the Committee of 300 has lots of Jews. If not then you both may be right and the book was written as a diversion away from Israel but clearly they are involved.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

While I am sure if that council were real it would be mostly jews, I would not try to extrapolate that to all jews. When I, or any other reasonable person, say "the jews did it" what that means is that the people responsible are jews and not that all jews are involved.

I am cognizent of the fact that blaming jews has been programmed into the masses as a trigger which causes them to shut down cognitively and turn against the speaker. As such many people choose their words wisely to avoid mentioning jews. I don't think that necisarily indicates deception.

So that part of it is not at all what concerns me.