Fauchi's daughter worked at twitter.

submitted by Canbot from vid8.poal.co

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (40 children)

time for new accusations

Right. Because this one is wrong. It's not true, a lie, and it's not working, so we need another accusation.

Like the last conversation we had where we agreed that the accusations that the biden government were censoring the internet via twitter - we agree that that accusation was a lie, and so it was time for a new accusation, and so here we are debunking another lie.

Another lie which like the last one, people here enjoy more as a cosy fictional narrative than a true fact about reality.

But here I keep ruining things by pointing out that these cosy fictional narratives are not actually true reality, so it's time for new accusations.

I understand you more than you think.

It's time for new accusations and I'll be there with you debunking it as a false lie.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (39 children)

Debunking is great, but when you distort what your eye balls tell you, you have descended into shill territory. Shill.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (38 children)

My eyeballs told me that the tweet in the OP was dated October 2022. And my eyeballs opened a new tab and typed "linkedin.com" and searched "Alison fauci" and told me that she left twitter and works somewhere else.

So no, my eyeballs aren't distorting anything - wouldn't that be a more suitable accusation to be leveled at OP who incorrectly wrote a lie that she was involved in removing some mild dumb tweet in October? Whose eyeballs are distorted here?

Anyway, this one is dumb, it has no legs, it's time for new accusations. You don't have to defend this one much further TBH dude because it's too easily debunked - just go to the next one and I'll see you there.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (36 children)

I never said one positive thing about this post. My eyeballs do see government employees indirectly asking twitter to censor constitutionally protected speech.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (35 children)

Wow, which constitution? I would love to read which constitution says that private corporations can't make private rules about speech.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (34 children)

government employees

you shill

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

You wrote

asking twitter to censor constitutionally protected speech.

Twitter can control what's on their platform without first amendment considerations.

And it wasn't censorship - it was policy reviews of content, which unless someone can demonstrate otherwise, twitter would have taken down anyway if they found it independently.

It was a glorified version of "report this tweet".

It wasn't censorship. There are no 1A considerations for "report this tweet". Government employees weren't pushing the button to remove content.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

Government employees weren't pushing the button to remove content.

It doesn't matter, they ordered the removal, which is outside of their job duties and thus illegal.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

No they didn't, they reported a tweet for policy review.

See, it seems like you're still confused after we had a long conversation and reviewed a lot of the evidence.

We didn't see any evidence of ordered removal and we didn't see anyone acting outside their job duties, did we. Where have you seen anyone ordering removal or acting outside their job duties?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

It's clearly outside of their responsibilities and I hope it ends up in court. I hope DHS is censured for this shit too: https://thepostmillennial.com/dhs-leaks-starting-in-2020-dhs-began-meeting-with-twitter-facebook-wikipedia-and-more-monthly-to-coordinate-content-moderation-efforts

Obama legalized propaganda but not censorship.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok groomer