you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Drewski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (51 children)

A software engineer probably wouldn't have been responsible for content moderation though.

[–]troubleshooter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (50 children)

but isnt it the coders that write the algos that auto-hide posts, etc?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (49 children)

Her linkedin says she wrote graphQL endpoints, and left months before the tweet in the OP.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (46 children)

But she worked there during the 2020 election when Twitter pushed propaganda for Biden and helped steal the election from Trump?

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (44 children)

That wasn't the accusation. The meme is about an October post.

Basically what you're saying is that no relative of any serving US official should have to work during election year, to avoid appearance of conflict - even if they're just writing graphQL APIs? Is that right

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (41 children)

It's time for new accusations. The criminal Bidens suck and have embarrassed Americans everywhere.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (40 children)

time for new accusations

Right. Because this one is wrong. It's not true, a lie, and it's not working, so we need another accusation.

Like the last conversation we had where we agreed that the accusations that the biden government were censoring the internet via twitter - we agree that that accusation was a lie, and so it was time for a new accusation, and so here we are debunking another lie.

Another lie which like the last one, people here enjoy more as a cosy fictional narrative than a true fact about reality.

But here I keep ruining things by pointing out that these cosy fictional narratives are not actually true reality, so it's time for new accusations.

I understand you more than you think.

It's time for new accusations and I'll be there with you debunking it as a false lie.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (39 children)

Debunking is great, but when you distort what your eye balls tell you, you have descended into shill territory. Shill.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (38 children)

My eyeballs told me that the tweet in the OP was dated October 2022. And my eyeballs opened a new tab and typed "linkedin.com" and searched "Alison fauci" and told me that she left twitter and works somewhere else.

So no, my eyeballs aren't distorting anything - wouldn't that be a more suitable accusation to be leveled at OP who incorrectly wrote a lie that she was involved in removing some mild dumb tweet in October? Whose eyeballs are distorted here?

Anyway, this one is dumb, it has no legs, it's time for new accusations. You don't have to defend this one much further TBH dude because it's too easily debunked - just go to the next one and I'll see you there.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (36 children)

I never said one positive thing about this post. My eyeballs do see government employees indirectly asking twitter to censor constitutionally protected speech.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok groomer

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just like you accuse Gays, Jews, and Republicans of pedophilia to cover up for your own raping of little girls.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It sounds like you're agreeing that it's a silly rule for all US public employees' relatives to have to not work during election years.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She certainly did nothing to stop it.

[–]troubleshooter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

i see that the crazy people have found saidit

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. Not a lot crazier than looking up a primary source of information and relaying it back correctly. In the land of the blind conspiritards the guy who actually validates information is a weirdo