you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

suspect that you are lying out of your ass, as usual

Put aside your suspicions and check. It took me 15 seconds to check, why are you so allergic to checking?

https://www.linkedin.com/mwlite/in/alifau

regardless, the claim is conflict of interest

She didn't work there. There was no conflict. She literally was not an employee at the time.

And as an employee, she wrote graphQL APIs. So it wouldn't be a conflict even if she did work there.

that he personally had the investigation against the company

Youve forgotten your conspiracy theory. The investigation was into a corrupt prosecutor.

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There are no such things as "conspiracies." There really are bad people in power who want to hurt you. Donald Trump isn't one of them. Get your head out of your ass.

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He literally wrote a theory about collusion. That makes him a collusion theorist. Funnily enough you're not the only person on this board this week to insist that a collusion theory isn't a conspiracy theory

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fuck off pedo

[–]Site_rly_sux 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh okay sounds like you figured out how the commenter above forgot his conspiracy narrative and said the wrong thing. But now you're avoiding admitting you were wrong to cover up for him, by changing the topic. Well that's okay, we can change the topic, you simply have to first admit that you were wrong to cover for the guy who forgot his conspiracy narrative because he was actually wrong about which narrative he was trying to tell and made himself look silly, which has now brushed off onto you