you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

You want the link to the WHO recommendation?

Or you don't believe that more than one region of one country follows the WHO recommendations?

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

You want the link to the WHO recommendation?

No. Find a link to a country that currently adds this to their drinking water without uses.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Water treatment is generally a local government thing.

It's one of 7 insecticides that the WHO recommends as allowable in drinking water. There will be a metric fuckton of towns and cities around Africa, South America and South East Asia where there is a malaria or dengue (or Zika) problem.

I don't have a list of which cities use which one.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

The point being that a metric shitload of water supplies have this pesticide.

So you're just making things up.

Par for the course.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

That will be true. The pesticides recommended by the WHO will be the ones used. And there will be fucktons of instances.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

That will be true.

Mkay

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Moreover Recife didn't use it, and they had the most cases of microcephaly.

So that blows your theory out of the water anyway, even if you're going to claim that of the 4 million cities in the world only a few around Bahia used Pyriproxyfen.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I don't see any sources of evidence to support your argument.

I'm bored of your foolishness. Bye.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I don't see any sources of evidence to support your argument.

Above in this thread.

The city with the most microcephaly was Recife, where they didn't use pyriproxyfen but instead used bti, a bacteria.

I'm bored of your foolishness. Bye.

No, you're embarrassed by being wrong. And instead of changing your position to match the evidence, you're ignoring the evidence. The inability to look at contrary evidence is common in conspiracy theorists.

Bye.

See ya.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're using the criminals to solve the crime.

Shills gonna shill.