The Mysterious Case of Zika-Microcephaly's Disappearance

submitted by [deleted] from brownstone.org

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're using the criminals to solve the crime.

Shills gonna shill.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The simple fact is that Recife had that largest share of cases of microcephaly and did not use pyriproxyfen.

It doesn't matter who's trying to solve the crime. It's pyriproxyfen clearly didn't cause the plurality of microcephaly cases, because there wasn't any fucking exposure to pyriproxyfen.

This isn't rocket science.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Thanks, shill.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No problem, sucker.

Any future time I notice you're badly misinformed about something, I'll try to help.

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're here to misinform.

It's too easy to see through your nonsense.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you're saying that pyriproxyfen was used in Reciefe?

Or that that's not where the largest number of microcephaly cases were?

Both are wrong, the numbers are in the linked paper, and I think you know that.

So I guess that it is you who is here to misinform. I never got why you shills always accuse us of doing what you're doing.

Is it because you imagine everyone motivated by the same evil that you are? Are you simply projecting? Or is this one of the techniques that you use to spread the feeling that the other side is as bad as you are, so no one is right?