Pick one?

You know that's not how it works. Whether it's corporate media, Alex Jones, Viva Frei, Trump, or whoever - take it with a grain of source. We need to drill down to find whether it's true or not - or something between. Most folks don't have time for that. So as is, it's a very flawed but powerful weapon in the info war.

The video could certainly use a crowd-sourced fan-edit to correct some issues. Shame there aren't more creatives and researchers to draw from and willing on SaidIt. Then again, shame the quality of users here wasn't better, but muh free speech amirite? At least it's not 4-chan I guess.

Taking heart surgery footage off of YouTube and passing it off as something vaccine related is not an 'editorial mistake'.

Overall, I'd totally agree. The producers need to be, and be held, responsible.

As Devil's advocate, there could be a zillion reasons how bullshit was included. From inexperienced interns trying to assemble the most graphic imagery, poor source vetting, financial motives, intentional subterfuge from agents or infiltrators, to shooting themselves in the foot trying to communicate a point via terrible editorial choices.

To the oblivious sheeple it's powerful content.

To skeptics it's inaccurately sloppy if generally on point.

But the worst is how perfectly plays into the enemy's story.

And that's why, for the most part, I avoid Stew Peters - like Alex Jones, Noam Chomsky, Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, etc etc etc.