That article does not address any of my points, and is either wrong or lying in many places. For example it claims lesbians aren't mentioned because it's sexist, and every act is from the male initiator point of view. Clearly this person has not read the one on zoophilia, which specifically says that a woman should not lie down to be fucked by a beast.

As always the only legitimate one is Romans 1:26-27. But check out Against Marcion to see how much of Romans 1:18-32 he had (hint: only the first verse), and while you do that consider that it contains an abundance of language completely unlike Paul's.

Most of the rest of the article has nothing to do with condemnation, but merely disproves stupid woke arguments for every single good character being gay. That proves nothing but neutrality, the most logical position for this matter. If you cannot see this you are subscribing to the foolish modern notion that everyone must be explicitly for or against every single culture war issue, and that disavowing culture wars and identity politics is impossible.