all 26 comments

[–]MightyMorphinFaggot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think everyone who thought dodged the vax is better than those who stuffed it in themselves.

You can just BE better than someone else. You don't have to accept bullshit if it's just bullshit.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I always can top Nietzsche with Schopenhauer. But also I got no interest in inciting any thought of divergence here.

Schopenhauer, you always can cite. Nietzsche is kinda hard digestible nowadays. Also: Let's not forget, how he ended.

Schopenhauer on the other hand chose the door of man. All his life.

[–]HibikiBlackCaudillo[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's fine. I like Nietzsche because of how ironic he was and how he didn't neccesarily believe the things he said. He wrote some of his stuff to be similar to passages from the Bible in an ironic fashion, kind of like a dark version of Socrates.

Either way, I believe Aristotle, Socrates and Kierkegaard were superior philosophers to him.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I tried to make sure... you stay what you are. That's all. I appreciate your stuff.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you familiar with Stirner at all? He is enough like Nietzsche that some scholars think Nietzsche ripped off some of his ideas. I think he is also a superior philospher to Nietzsche with a similar style.

This is a good translation of his work if it interests you at all

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-the-unique-and-its-property

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ego_and_Its_Own (very brief summary)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You ever read Max Stirner? Some people accuse Nietzsche of ripping of him off, although this seems unlikey. Regardless, I think he is a superior philosopher to Nietzsche in that vein.

If you are interested here is a translation of his work "der einzige und sein eigentum". This is the better and newer translation "The unique and its property", the older version is "The Ego and Its Own"

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/max-stirner-the-unique-and-its-property

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ego_and_Its_Own (very brief summary)

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. I speak German native. I will look into this.

[–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

10 people find the perfect answer on how to live.

10 different people create a society with different values and morals.

Which is better and which one is this quote advocating? Nietzsche needs to be categorised with the likes of Freud and the other tard jars that say correct things that are bad for you.

[–][deleted]  (18 children)

[removed]

    [–]Vulptex[A] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

    Removed for advocating violence.

    [–]MONKEYBALLSs 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

    You are really one seriously dumb fuck tranny.

    Check this shit out ..

    It really bugs me that I have to explain myself to a shitforbrains like you..

    So here goes..

    We now live in a world where there is always "one group" that is being eliminated "via war"...

    Are you following me, dumbfuck?

    We already live in a system where people are always being eliminated.

    Go fucking shag yourself, you disgusting piece of tranny garbage.

    I do hope that I was pleasant.

    [–]Vulptex 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

    And we also live in a system where saidit has to ban advocation of violence or risk censorship and even lawsuits.

    [–]Sucksdickpig 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    And we also live in a system where saidit has to ban advocation of violence or risk censorship and even lawsuits.

    None of that is true. Pure lies.

    Fuck trannies.

    [–]Vulptex 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    Lol this was #69 in my inbox.

    [–]MONKEYBALLSs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    No you don't. You are stupid.

    [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I don't make the rules, I just follow them.

    [–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    I want to know what he said so I can use it as an example of what is considered violence here, because so far I can't figure it out.

    [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    He said everyone should be happy, except one group who must be eliminated.

    It's definitely erring on the side of caution, but that's better than risking the whole site being taken down or m7's life being ruined with lawsuits. Saidit's has already been on thin ice with its hosts before, ex. /s/Ice_Poseidon. Otherwise it would (I think at least) be allowed because it's just harmless words.

    [–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    So, its not violence, its violence against a certain group of people? Because what if i said all evil people should be eliminated? Or all chess players should be eliminated?

    [–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    No, it's violence, as far as I understand. I think you could argue for something like the death penalty, without saying things like "x should be lynched or eliminated". That kind of language is usually what triggers those who could shut down saidit. It's even worse if it's a specific individual. I do wish it were a less vague policy, but that's how I've seen it enforced by the owner. Usually I try to be very much on the lenient side, but if it's something that could put saidit in danger, especially since the owner is very distant right now, there needs to be a lot of caution. The owner knows it far better than any of us, since its his rule, and you can try asking him instead but you may be waiting a while to get a response.

    Also, the user in question is a serial spammer who has been banned many times from saidit, who is now posting porn and IP grabbers, and is claiming to be posting CP.

    [–]Anman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Oh yeah, serial fags, not the issue, I get that part. I just have not restrained myself at all and I love violence and understand that the world can only be cleansed in fire. Also I keep telling weegs he needs to fall down some stairs. So I am unsure how I am getting through and others arent. Maybe I just don't post enough.