Holocaust denial arguments: the true maximum cremation capacity at Auschwitz-Birkenau.

submitted by HibikiBlackCaudillo from self.conspiracy

Auschwitz-Birkenau, the alleged largest extermination camp, had several crematoria. Lots of fairytales have been told about these installations, e.g. that they were able to cremate millions of corpses.

An important data source is a chapter from Germar Rudolf's book "Dissecting the Holocaust". This chapter "The crematoria ovens of Auschwitz and Birkenau" starts on page 373 and was written by (guest star) Carlo Mattogno.

Auschwitz-Birkenau had 4 crematoria: Krema II-III-IV-V. (Krema I was a relatively small installation in Auschwitz I which was not an alleged extermination camp. When the other Kremas came into operation, Krema I was shut down).

Capacity: Krema II had 5 ovens with each 3 muffles. In operation: 166 days in 1943 and 266 days in 1944. Total: 432 (days) x 15 (muffles) = 6,480 cremation days of 1 muffle.

Krema III also had 5 ovens of each 3 muffles. In operation: 190 days in 1943 and 266 days in 1944. Total: 456 (days) x 15 (muffles) = 6,840 cremation days of 1 muffle.

Krema IV had 2 ovens of each 4 muffles. In operation: only 50 days in 1943 then it suffered damage beyond repair and was not used any longer. Total: 50 (days) x 8 (muffles) = 400 cremation days of 1 muffle.

Krema V also had 2 ovens of 4 muffles. In operation: 82 days in 1943 and 144 days in 1944/45. Total: 226 (days x 8 (muffles) = 1,808 cremation days of 1 muffle.

Grand total of one day operations of 1 muffle: 6,480 + 6,840 + 50 + 1,808 = 15,528 cremation days of 1 muffle.

The ovens were not operated longer than 12 hours a day (even no longer than 9 hours a day, according to certain established historians). To burn one corpse would take at least one hour with this equipment, hence the maximum would have been close to 12 corpses a day. Sometimes two corpses would fit in one muffle, but only two very light ones, e.g. two 75 lb corpses or two children. But because a double load lengthens the cremation time and because single loads were standard, I estimate the maximum capacity to be definitely not larger than 1.2 corpses per hour.

The maximum number of corpses that could possibly have been cremated:

With 10 corpses a day per muffle the maximum number would have been...155,280

With 12 corpses a day per muffle (1/hr)............................................... ....186,336

With 14.4 corpses a day per muffle (1.2/hr)...............................................223,603

These figures are not an indication of how many were actually cremated, but are estimates of how many could possibly have been cremated.

The Truth cannot be far away from these figures; actually an estimate of 14 corpses a day per muffle is almost unrealistically high, particularly as a standard for all cremation days. E.g. sometimes the ovens were in operation for less than 12 hrs/day, sometimes there was a temporary fuel shortage or a few muffles temporarily out of order etc.

Multi-million figures provided by the Holocaust mafia are totally nonsensical and are claimed only for extortion purposes.

Nizkor claims a capacity of 1,7 million cremations for Krema II and III alone. A miracle of sorts... This completely debunks the revisionist claims that 1.5 million Jews died in Poland, or the even more absurd original claim that 4 million of them were killed, which was later changed because of the pressure from the revisionists, probably to create the false idea that some kind of new study was done to give a more accurate estimate, but even the revisionist version is also a lie.

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]StillLessons 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I appreciate being on a site where this kind of material can be displayed. I don't spend any time in my life thinking about or talking to people about the Holocaust and whether or not it is accurate, but to treat conversation about this material as reason in-and-of-itself for a person to be shunned and (in some countries) potentially imprisoned is a massive slap in the face to the concept of "an open society". Our societies are anything but open when certain subjects are considered officially taboo and not to be discussed.

I'm even fine with keeping the discussion of child exploitation legally and organizationally open. Doing so keeps the people discussing this kind of crap out in the open. When they discuss shit like this, they will discover that on an individual basis, they are taking a serious risk because parents are not going to react well, and that kind of individual reaction is entirely appropriate when people see an existential threat to their children.

Having organizations (including "private - in name only" corporations) and governments deciding what individuals are and are not allowed to talk about is absolutely destructive. In the end, those organizations end up using their censorship power to allow their supporters the most heinous of behaviors while punishing individual citizens harshly for the equivalent of complaining about parking tickets. It's tyranny, and it's what we are fighting today.

[–]portace 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm open to more evidence, but the mainstream version of history should be presented in detail followed by debunking of whichever points are claimed to be false, with lots of evidence.

It seems like the numbers may be inaccurate and purposely bloated, which is certainly plausible, but doesn't mean the Jews weren't genocided. Would it really matter if the number goes from millions to hundreds of thousands?

The fact there are so many speech laws around the world and manufactured consent going into the Holocaust situation does make it seem fishier, but I would need to go through both sides of the argument in detail to reach an assumption.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It seems like the numbers may be inaccurate and purposely bloated, which is certainly plausible, but doesn't mean the Jews weren't genocided. Would it really matter if the number goes from millions to hundreds of thousands?

That's precisely what it would mean. If the death rates of Jews were typical compared to everyone else during the war period, that would suggest that there was no effort to murder them all.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What about the more than 250 times that Jewish organizations published articles claiming that "6 million Jews were exterminated" at all different times and places around the world, between 1800 and 1936? This is well documented too. It was a fabrication the first 255 times, but the 256th it suddenly came true? More like, the 256th THEY WERE ABLE TO MAKE IT STICK because Hitler was seriously anti-Jewish... Especially for their lies. Add to that the fact that Jews are indoctrinated from the youngest age to pride themselves on fooling the goys, is there any reason to be surprised by any of this?

[–]ShaGuar 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Watch 100% holohoax proof on bitchute

[–]chottohen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's an excerpt from a Wiki entry titled Antisemitism in Japan :

1990s

In February 1995 a magazine named Marco Polo (マルコポーロ), a 250,000-circulation monthly aimed at Japanese males, ran a Holocaust denial article by physician Masanori Nishioka (西岡昌紀) which stated:

"The 'Holocaust' is a fabrication. There were no execution gas chambers in Auschwitz or in any other concentration camp. Today, what are displayed as 'gas chambers' at the remains of the Auschwitz camp in Poland are a post-war fabrication by the Polish communist regime or by the Soviet Union, which controlled the country. Not once, neither at Auschwitz nor in any territory controlled by the Germans during the Second World War, was there 'mass murder of Jews' in 'gas chambers.'"[25] The Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center instigated a boycott of Bungei Shunju advertisers, including Volkswagen, Mitsubishi, and Cartier. Within days, Bungei Shunju shut down Marco Polo and its editor, Kazuyoshi Hanada, quit, as did the president of Bungei Shunju, Kengo Tanaka.[citation needed]

In October 1999 a Japanese publication, The Weekly Post, published a story on the proposed acquisition of the Long-Term Credit Bank of Japan by Ripplewood Holdings, which the article described as being "Jewish":

"The strong will of Jewish finance capital, which prides itself on its enormous power and covers the world's financial markets like a fine net, was behind the buyout of LTCBJ. It is not hard to imagine that the offensive of Jewish finance capital will intensify the cutthroat struggle for survival among companies brought on by the 1997 Asian financial crisis."[26] This soon generated strong complaints by Jewish groups, particularly outside Japan. The Weekly Post quickly retracted the article and carried an apology on its home page. The publication explained its error by noting that "the problem stemmed from the stereotyped image of the Jewish people that many Japanese people have."[13]