all 2 comments

[–]proc0 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you tell me that those dying with the jab, don't really count as dying with covid... fine, but now explain why last year we went into lockdown, and everyone thought the world was going to end when the numbers were skewed. So now that the conversation has moved on to taking the jab, it's just pointing out that EVEN IF the death count is that bad, the jab is NOT WORKING, at least not as initially advertised.

No conversation would be necessary if people just acted on their own accord... this doesn't prevent the vulnerable from quarantining themselves and quadruple jabbing, if they want. However this whole time it's about forcing people to comply, and doing so on a global scale, never before seen.

[–]StillLessons 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My recommendation is to look at the numbers yourself. CDC is publishing statistics on Covid in real time. I watch those datasets and the equivalent ones where I can get them from other countries. There is room for massive manipulation for sure. I personally have seen huge drops in numbers from one day to the next with no explanation. But there are datasets and very few people go to check the source data. Be one of them.

I don't particularly care about the "he said / he said" problem, with one exception: CDC's own published statistics don't remotely begin to tell the story that Wolensky pushes or that of any of her partners in crime.

We each need to do the homework for ourselves before we decide which voices make sense to us.