you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeyImSancho 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The EO definitely shows bias; especially the fact Dershowitz was present. It appeared like he was showing the world while he's strongly implicated in pedo-island, and an Epstein confidant, that he's above the law, and has the protection of the US govt.

My thoughts on everything we're seeing is as follows. You've got to have a degree of 'understanding', solid footing, know your 'bearing', or insert your favorite saying (here) to wade your way through the world.

Like many presidents before Trump, most are voted in as the lessor of 2 evils. With Trump, they made it either Him, or Killary, and he definitely has a down to earth personality in many ways. I thought when I first heard him talk at a debate(the fact they let him talk, is telling in it's own right) that he was the selection, and I thought then we'd be seeing some massive psychological 'wtfs' in the not too distant future, and we are. I think it's on purpose, and those folks who set their 'bearings' on him, as their rock, a good amount of the American people, are being demoralized every time he does something like this. It seems like a permanent destruction of the American identity by way of psychological means.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

i think trump was groomed to be a president one day, constantly maintaining his public profile, and keeping him in our collective consciousness. and i think there was a shitton of reverse psychology in how the msm promoted clinton and attacked trump. tptsb, they know their sheeple too well. the globalists are dismantling america to make way for the nwo, and trump is simply doing his part. what else can he do?

[–]HeyImSancho 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

what else can he do?

I can think of a few things, but that would be beyond ignorant as well. I would think the position he holds also comes with a 'if you do not cooperate clause'...... which I'm sure he was, and is aware of.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

oh, he is aware of ... jfk..

[–]Froglich 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I would think the position he holds also comes with a 'if you do not cooperate clause'...... which I'm sure he was, and is aware of.

Why create this hypothetical excuse? Would you extend this logic to HRC?

Neither are on your side.

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think they all have a degree of 'if you do not cooperate clause'; of course, they all meet a certain moral character as well, and in many regards muting any need for such clauses in general practice, lol. As far as anyone on my side? The only one who's on anyone's side is oneself when it really comes down to it at the end of the day.

There will never be anyone who everyone just loves, there will always be haters, critics, naysayers, and those with their own motivations for what they do. Even 'saviors' have critics; how is it so when they claim perfection? No leader will ever be perfect to at least some number of people.

In realizing this, I guess it can mean whatever to whoever.