you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Froglich 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I would think the position he holds also comes with a 'if you do not cooperate clause'...... which I'm sure he was, and is aware of.

Why create this hypothetical excuse? Would you extend this logic to HRC?

Neither are on your side.

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think they all have a degree of 'if you do not cooperate clause'; of course, they all meet a certain moral character as well, and in many regards muting any need for such clauses in general practice, lol. As far as anyone on my side? The only one who's on anyone's side is oneself when it really comes down to it at the end of the day.

There will never be anyone who everyone just loves, there will always be haters, critics, naysayers, and those with their own motivations for what they do. Even 'saviors' have critics; how is it so when they claim perfection? No leader will ever be perfect to at least some number of people.

In realizing this, I guess it can mean whatever to whoever.