Antonio Gramsci, Cultural Marxism, Wokeness, and Leninism 4.0 (57:33) ~ New Discourses

JasonCarswell · 2021-02-06T01:22:19+00:00

See also:

/s/politics/comments/7brv/antonio_gramsci_cultural_marxism_wokeness_and/

/s/politics/comments/7bsv/the_new_wave_of_communism_critical_theory_america/

JasonCarswell · 2021-02-05T23:22:21+00:00

A++

I found this video deeply insightful as a clear summary on the seeds of Cultural Totalitarianism (a more appropriate name than Cultural Communism or Cultural Marxism) that grows unfettered in our current age.

I must point out that the Woke™ culture infecting education and churches was mentioned but not mass media culture - the primary influence on most of us, directly or indirectly.

I knew there was more to this Woke™ media than the simple division of culture (to have them perpetually fight in tribes), distraction (from any political awareness, much less authentic contextual understanding), and shitty screenplays and agenda driven productions that clearly are anything but financially successful.

I found his concise words to be illuminating on how the Woke™ folks have a dogmatic religion with absurd goals for a utopian world that can never be. I believe we can build our own anti-tyranny counter-movement with contextual understanding and sustainable, flexible, resilient, decentralized goals.

Above all, what spoke to me, is the idea of creating culture. He mentions the status quo culture and the new Woke™ culture to replace it - but he didn't mention any other culture where the authentic revolution for freedom from tyranny might occur.

I won't go into it right here, but will soon be sharing a series of posts that I've long been developing, regarding many things, including creating some open-source manifestos (to declare our intentions, goals, plans, etc), as well as many interactive social media and video production projects - all to be hosted on SaidIt, WikiSpooks, and beyond.

JasonCarswell · 2021-01-25T00:35:47+00:00

See also:
/s/politics/comments/78ro/boogaloo_boy_interview_radicalized_michigan/

TheAmeliaMay · 2021-01-01T09:57:15+00:00

Even less for BLM, which is a communist terrorist organization.

https://www.idrlabs.com/black-lives-matter/test.php

TheAmeliaMay · 2021-01-01T09:42:34+00:00

https://www.idrlabs.com/communism/test.php

Jesus · 2020-11-13T18:12:34+00:00

Nothing about Neocons. They were former trotskyites

Marginotions · 2020-10-27T08:05:42+00:00

Turning Point USA

Jesus · 2020-09-06T04:30:10+00:00

https://www.solzhenitsyncenter.org/whats-new/2020/6/9/solzhenitsyn-quote-on-police-a-fake

Jesus · 2020-09-06T04:29:58+00:00

It's a fake quote, I'm deleting it.

Marou · 2020-06-26T11:13:52+00:00

Yeah - that guy wasn't an industrialist.

You're right, he was a leech sitting on top of productive capacity.

Fun fact, the term "privatization" was coined by the Nazis. Corporate profits soared in Hitler's reign. It was the Aryan industrialists that put Hitler in power to begin with.

In large part this is true. Much of his support in the US also came from Industrialists, Henry Ford for instance. Industrialists are productive members of society, the usurers that often end up seizing control of their creations through manipulation and malfeasance are not.

Then why is there no evidence of this?

Read Icebreaker by Suvorov, it has near ubiquitous support inside Russia and a couple of external detractors.

And why was the Red Army in such shitty condition in 1941?

The Red Army was shitty not because of manpower, but because of the incompetence of Stalin and communism in general. Intelligent officers were eliminated and replaced with inexperienced loyalists (Red Army Purges). Good tactical decisions could not be made because the game of telephone softened the blow of bad news so much that by the time it reached the generals ears it seemed like a minor inconvenience. In addition, the forces were in the middle of reorganization when the attack occurred - this wasn't on accident.

So this "bankrolling" of communist insurgents consisted of passing a few motions in the Comintern?

Money well spent, as by 1935 Marxists had taken control of the French government and put a Marxist jew named Blum in charge. This is why the French "lost" so easily to Germany. It's not like the Military in France were huge fans of their Marxist government.

Why would that necessitate giving the Soviets 200 million marks?

It wasn't a "give", it was an exchange.

And how does that justify the invasion of Poland,

Poland was invaded primarily to meet the promises of restoring Germany to it's pre-WW1 state. I'd assume you know this. Danzig and the surrounding area were majority ethnic German - as until very recently they had been Germany.

the Intelligenzaktion

This was an elimination of the people that would resist and was prudent.

the ethnic cleansing of Poles

Wasn't actually. It was the targeted elimination of jews, Nobles, Clergy, and community leaders that offered opposition to the NSDAP. War is war - if you want to occupy a territory and reshape it in your image - you either do this or throw people in camps to die. Personally I'd rather be shot outright, but your mileage may vary depending on your tolerance for lack of autonomy and penchant for slave labor.

and the Gestapo's cooperation with the NKVD?

In concordance with the pact. Germany cared about restoring pre-WW1 Germany, it truly didn't care what happened to the rest of Poland. Nor should it have. Ethnic Germans suffered much abuse at the hands of poles between WW1 and 2. Projecting this onto the modern world - I wouldn't feel sorry for the Bantu in South Africa if they got taken over by China, and if I had to make a deal to Annex parts of South Africa to save the Boers, I would.

Whoa, let's handle one conspiracy theory at a time, OK?

Are they theories though if you have reams of documentation, or merely conspiracies that occurred? I'd call them the latter. Theories cease to be such when supported by adequate evidence.

kissfan7 · 2020-06-26T10:30:44+00:00

Yeah - that guy wasn't an industrialist.

Fun fact, the term "privatization" was coined by the Nazis. Corporate profits soared in Hitler's reign. It was the Aryan industrialists that put Hitler in power to begin with.

he thought he'd be the one to break it when he had gathered sufficient strength.

Then why is there no evidence of this? And why was the Red Army in such shitty condition in 1941?

Guns though, I don't know.

So this "bankrolling" of communist insurgents consisted of passing a few motions in the Comintern? Why would that necessitate giving the Soviets 200 million marks? And how does that justify the invasion of Poland, the Intelligenzaktion, the ethnic cleansing of Poles, and the Gestapo's cooperation with the NKVD?

Pearl Harbor would have been allowed to occur regardless, because FDR was itching to get in prior to Barbarossa.

Whoa, let's handle one conspiracy theory at a time, OK?

Jesus · 2020-06-26T07:58:53+00:00

No, let us hold them accountable for their actions but stand by those who uphold their duty.

Marou · 2020-06-26T04:48:03+00:00

Hitler was the industrialist's bitch. They owned him lock, stock, and barrel. To call his critiques of capitalism anything but politicking is naive at best.

Yeah - no.

https://concisepolitics.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/hitler-arrested-baron-louis-de-rothschild.jpg

And is Antifa in the room with us now?

I don't know, are they?

Stalin didn't believe Hitler would break the Pact, according to every historian I've read. The British, Americans, and his own spies warned of the impending attack, but he mostly ignored them. That's why the beginning of Barbarossa was so disastrous for the USSR (and for the numerous civilians murdered by the advancing Germans).

I know he didn't, he thought he'd be the one to break it when he had gathered sufficient strength. The German army were greeted as liberators in almost all of the Baltic countries and the Ukraine.

Specifically, I'd like sources that say the USSR gave arms during the 1934 riots.

Popular Front (France): In May 1935, France and the Soviet Union signed a defensive alliance, and in August 1935, the 7th World Congress of the Comintern officially endorsed the Popular Front strategy. In the elections of May 1936, the Popular Front won a majority of parliamentary seats (378 deputies against 220), and Blum formed a government.

Soviets were involved in funding and helping organize the french precursors to the "Popular Front". The 1934 (far-right) uprising was against the communists that were trying to (and ultimately did) wrest control of the government. Guns though, I don't know.

And let's get to the point, was the USSR more powerful in 1941 or 1945?

Militarily they were more powerful in 1941. Territorially they were more powerful in 1945. Had operation Barbarossa not occurred the Soviet Union would have been able to capture far more territory in Europe because the Soviets would have struck when Germany was exhausted from it's conflicts with other European powers and the US. Pearl Harbor would have been allowed to occur regardless, because FDR was itching to get in prior to Barbarossa.

kissfan7 · 2020-06-26T04:27:33+00:00

Hitler was the industrialist's bitch. They owned him lock, stock, and barrel. To call his critiques of capitalism anything but politicking is naive at best.

Antifa, the same party - active all over the world now, still believes this, and are fighting this battle, even if we aren't.

And is Antifa in the room with us now?

Both intending the entire time to stab the other in the back.

Stalin didn't believe Hitler would break the Pact, according to every historian I've read. The British, Americans, and his own spies warned of the impending attack, but he mostly ignored them. That's why the beginning of Barbarossa was so disastrous for the USSR (and for the numerous civilians murdered by the advancing Germans).

They were funding the radical socialists in France and other areas all throughout the 1930's. I can find citations if you want them

Specifically, I'd like sources that say the USSR gave arms during the 1934 riots.

And let's get to the point, was the USSR more powerful in 1941 or 1945?

No, I'm stating unequivocally that at least today Poland is still the land of the Poles.

It was the land of the Poles in 1939 when your boy unleashed a genocide upon the Polish people that they've only recently recovered from.

Marou · 2020-06-26T03:36:12+00:00

I'm not grasping at straws, I'm just being pedantic.

Fair enough.

Focus, kid. We're talking about how Hitler and Stalin were allies, not questioning capitalism (which Hitler was a full supporter of after the Night of the Long Knives).

I'll ignore the kid, since I'm probably your senior, "buddy" :p

Hitler from the start had a warped definition of Socialism that wasn't in accordance with Marxist definitions. He co-opted the term to mean socially conscious capitalism. Eg, capitalism that had to operate under constraints in which actions that were profitable but were not good for the German people would be shut down. In his own words - https://files.catbox.moe/8g470w.png

Nothing in there claims Hitler and Stalin weren't allies, nor disproves the fact that Germany gave the USSR loans, oil, and other goods.

In their own words, they were opposed to each others goals. They weren't sending each other postcards or hanging out for fun. They had diametrically opposed ideologies and any alliances were built of pure practicality and to further both of their ends. Both intending the entire time to stab the other in the back.

"This is grasping at straws and you know it."

It's not. Antifa, the same party - active all over the world now, still believes this, and are fighting this battle, even if we aren't. The only reason they haven't made more progress is the fact that they are a bunch of limp wristed degenerates. Only in times of financial strife can they gain any sort of mainstream appeal.

Not during 1939, when the Pact was made and economic cooperation between the USSR and Nazi Germany began.

On this you are wrong. They were funding the radical socialists in France and other areas all throughout the 1930's. I can find citations if you want them - I might have to photo some old school paper books though.

You're honestly arguing that the Poland that was occupied by the Soviets in 1945 was "stronger" than the Poland that beat the USSR in 1921?

No, I'm stating unequivocally that at least today Poland is still the land of the Poles. Western European countries fared worse in the wake of World War 2 than those that became part of the Soviet Union. They advanced materially but lost all of their identity. Countries aren't ideas or places alone, they are people tied to a land. Blood and Soil.

kissfan7 · 2020-06-26T03:15:42+00:00

This is grasping at straws and you know it.

I'm not grasping at straws, I'm just being pedantic.

Unrestrained capitalism is and has ever been ass. This is a separate argument[...]

Focus, kid. We're talking about how Hitler and Stalin were allies, not questioning capitalism (which Hitler was a full supporter of after the Night of the Long Knives).

Read the background section of the article you linked me about the 1939 agreement.

Nothing in there claims Hitler and Stalin weren't allies, nor disproves the fact that Germany gave the USSR loans, oil, and other goods.

The revolution was very much alive, and in fact still is.

"This is grasping at straws and you know it."

The soviets were bankrolling insurrections all over Europe [...]

Not during 1939, when the Pact was made and economic cooperation between the USSR and Nazi Germany began.

On this we can agree, the Poles got the short end of the stick from everyone.

"[T]he short end of the stick" is hell of a way to describe a genocide that killed 5.5 million Poles.

What didn't kill them definitely made them stronger

You're honestly arguing that the Poland that was occupied by the Soviets in 1945 was "stronger" than the Poland that beat the USSR in 1921?

yellow_algebra_31 · 2020-06-26T02:54:32+00:00

Let's stand by our police, then.

Marou · 2020-06-26T02:52:07+00:00

You can't really invade Europe when you ARE in Europe.

This is grasping at straws and you know it.

Despite all the differences in the ideologies of Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union: opposition to the capitalist democracies.

Unrestrained capitalism is and has ever been ass. This is a separate argument, but on that front I agree with the Fascists, National Socialists, and even Communists. Just about any system is better than unrestrained capitalism - where money buys political power and manufactures consent.

Face it, until being stabbed in the back, Hitler and Stalin were buddies. As Ribbentrop himself said, Hitler called Stalin "a man he could do business with".

At this point you're presenting a more liberal argument than Wikipedia, which is quite an accomplishment. Read the background section of the article you linked me about the 1939 agreement.

Nice try, but the Nazi Party was formed in 1920. The revolution ended in 1919.

No, most active clashes with the Military stopped. The revolution was very much alive, and in fact still is. The org name hasn't even changed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Germany

A Rally of said party: https://files.catbox.moe/q9sxnd.jpg

Many of these people infiltrated the Sturmabteilung and tried to subvert the party from within, resulting in the night of long knives.

His incompetence created the conditions for Mao. No Hitler, no Barbarossa. No Barbarossa, no Soviet increase in power. No Soviet increase in power, no resources to support Mao. No support for Mao, no Great Leap Forward.

This is also a big stretch. The soviets were bankrolling insurrections all over Europe, and had Germany flipped red would have ended up more powerful than they did in the current real world scenario. This is all theory-craft though, admittedly.

*Including defeats inflicted on the Soviets by the "untermench" Poles, who were later betrayed and slaughtered by the Nazis and their collaborators.

On this we can agree, the Poles got the short end of the stick from everyone. What didn't kill them definitely made them stronger - they are one of the only bastions in Europe against the degeneracy that has been normalized throughout the West.

/Unrelated side note - I haven't had this much fun arguing on the internet since Usenet. I suppose I'm allowed to upvote you even if I disagree. I appreciate effort posts. As I watch American and Western European cities burn it is being done by people tagging the symbols and flying the flags of Roter Frontkämpferbund and the Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands. But hey, at least we don't speak German, right?

kissfan7 · 2020-06-26T02:27:15+00:00

If you've read anything on Soviet history you know they were planning to invade Europe from the moment they won power.

Yeah, in 1917. Military defeats* since then made them abandon that goal. It wasn't until the failure of Barbarossa that the Soviets got another chance to take over Eastern Europe.

And I know this is a clash of definitions, but since most Soviet citizens lived west of the Ural Mountains, I'd classify the USSR as European. You can't really invade Europe when you ARE in Europe.

When the US, British Empire, and world Jewry started funneling massive loads of money after 1935 to the Soviets that Faustian bargain was struck.

Oh you mean like this?:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#Expansion_of_raw_materials_and_military_trading

And don't forget the 200 million mark loan Germany gave the USSR.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2%80%93Soviet_Credit_Agreement_(1939)

Face it, until being stabbed in the back, Hitler and Stalin were buddies. As Ribbentrop himself said, Hitler called Stalin "a man he could do business with".

Despite all the differences in the ideologies of Germany, Italy and the Soviet Union: opposition to the capitalist democracies.

~Karl Schnurre, German negotiator

The Wiemar republic was weak - without the nascent NSDAP fighting off Antifa there, the communists would have won

Nice try, but the Nazi Party was formed in 1920. The revolution ended in 1919.

So Hitler forced Lenin and Trotsky to starve tens of millions of Christians to death on purpose?

No, nice strawman, though.

He forced Mao's Leap Forward?

His incompetence created the conditions for Mao. No Hitler, no Barbarossa. No Barbarossa, no Soviet increase in power. No Soviet increase in power, no resources to support Mao. No support for Mao, no Great Leap Forward.

*Including defeats inflicted on the Soviets by the "untermench" Poles, who were later betrayed and slaughtered by the Nazis and their collaborators.

Marou · 2020-06-26T01:39:28+00:00

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was an alliance in which (like the later German/Italian/Japanese alliance) split up territory between the powers, allowing the USSR to annex parts of Finland, Poland, and Romania plus all of the Baltic Countries.

If you've read anything on Soviet history you know they were planning to invade Europe from the moment they won power. It was just a matter of building up their power and armies to do it. When the US, British Empire, and world Jewry started funneling massive loads of money after 1935 to the Soviets that Faustian bargain was struck. Neither side intended to keep to it. Again, reference the memoirs of those involved. Stalin thought he'd be the one who got to break it, and was caught off guard by Operation Barbarossa; which at the moment it was launched was more of a desperation move than a strategic one.

You can't look at any of the events of World War 2 without considering the self-stated motivations of the actors involved, and what their military intelligence knew at the time various decisions were made.

The Nazis' incompetent and foolhardy invasion of the USSR allowed it to take over all of Eastern Europe after the war. This allowed Marxism-Leninism to spread to various parts of the world, including North Korea, which started the Korean War.

Without the 3rd Reich the Soviets with their German Allies would have successfully taken over all or nearly all of Europe - and we'd have had a very different world. The Wiemar republic was weak, crippled as it was by the Treaty of Versailles and an anti-German press - without the nascent NSDAP fighting off Antifa there, the communists would have won; very nearly having done so in the original 1918 revolution. The stated goal from the very beginning with the Bolsheviks was and still is the utopia of "world communism". It's not like any of them make efforts to hide this.

Hitler's thirst for power and his incompetence was arguably responsible for most of those supposed 100 million deaths.

So Hitler forced Lenin and Trotsky to starve tens of millions of Christians to death on purpose? He forced Mao's Great Leap Forward? C'mon man.

kissfan7 · 2020-06-25T22:43:21+00:00

That armistice took place after three years of war costing three million lives.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was an alliance in which (like the later German/Italian/Japanese alliance) split up territory between the powers, allowing the USSR to annex parts of Finland, Poland, and Romania plus all of the Baltic Countries.

The Nazis' incompetent and foolhardy invasion of the USSR allowed it to take over all of Eastern Europe after the war. As a result, it became one of the two most powerful countries in the world. This allowed Marxism-Leninism to spread to various parts of the world, including North Korea, which started the Korean War.

Hitler's thirst for power and his incompetence was arguably responsible for most of those supposed 100 million deaths.

Marou · 2020-06-25T21:01:15+00:00

The US and the leadership of North Korea (backed by the Chinese) signed an armistice and divvied up Korea into 2 countries in 1953, North and South Korea. This is an apples to apples comparison to the Polish situation - so, by your twisted logic this means the US and North Korea/China were and are allies?

kissfan7 · 2020-06-25T19:11:04+00:00

It's not a position, it's a fact. Hitler and Stalin were allies. Why bother answering your loaded questions when you can't even address that fact?

Marou · 2020-06-25T17:22:22+00:00

I'm not sure what your position is, so I'm stabbing in the dark trying to educate you. Why don't you tell me specifically what your position is, and if it's wrong I'll tell you why - to the best of my ability.

Do you believe that Marxism isn't largely Judaic?
Do you believe that Bolshevism hasn't killed more people than any other ideology?
Do you believe that exactly 6 million jews, not one more or less were executed by Germany?

Lay it out for me in bullet points and I'll address each. Ad Hominems are low on the pyramid of debate.

kissfan7 · 2020-06-25T15:48:03+00:00

Never believe that anti‐ Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti‐Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. It is not that they are afraid of being convinced. They fear only to appear ridiculous or to prejudice by their embarrassment their hope of winning over some third person to their side.

Marou · 2020-06-25T13:39:48+00:00

You have a Marxist colored education, I'd assume you're content with that and don't wish to educate yourself. If I'm wrong, I'd suggest starting with the memoirs of major players. Hitler, Patton, Churchill, etc.

https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goeb58.htm

kissfan7 · 2020-06-25T10:40:47+00:00

Aren't you conveniently forgetting about something?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact

Marou · 2020-06-25T02:51:53+00:00

Bless your heart.

kissfan7 · 2020-06-25T02:39:01+00:00

Hitler and Stalin were allies.

Marou · 2020-06-25T01:29:23+00:00

Thanks, I needed that chuckle. Yes, it did. National Socialism was/is a movement that arose specifically to oppose communism - since traditional conservatism is ill equipped to deal with communists. It acknowledges that you can't defeat fanaticism and tribalism with individualism and crony capitalism.

https://archive.org/details/GeorgeLincolnRockwellAmericanNationalSocialism

kissfan7 · 2020-06-24T23:41:57+00:00

That turned Nazi real quick.

Marou · 2020-06-24T15:53:53+00:00

The "holocaust" to the extent it happened, can be seen as a tepid response to the holodomor, and the jewish led bolshevik revolution (https://files.catbox.moe/6ny4kg.jpg) that occured in Germany in 1918-1919.

https://holodomorinfo.com/glossery/bolshevik-atrocities/holodomor/

ua4 · 2020-06-24T08:55:59+00:00

100m is under estimated https://scottmanning.com/content/communist-body-count/

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-05-28T00:41:42+00:00

"June 19 1986 Glory To The Day Of Heroism" in Simple Gematria equals: 333

Captzapheart · 2020-04-10T00:06:33+00:00

So working together results in us eating each other.....thanks for the heads up.

useless_aether · 2020-04-03T08:36:49+00:00

https://www.freedomfirstsociety.org/reference/a-world-effectively-controlled-by-the-united-nations/

useless_aether · 2020-03-29T07:51:31+00:00

https://pic8.co/sh/HMiaNh.jpeg

Jesus · 2020-03-08T14:08:49+00:00

It ain't a PsyOp. NZ bankers were communists. Read A.N. Field's hundred year old book, "Other Things."

dark_devil_dd · 2020-03-08T11:41:53+00:00

White supremacists have published a highly confidential New Zealand Police document online in which banks were told to be on high alert about terror financing.

Police are now investigating how the sensitive memo was circulated on social media and have warned that distributing the document is illegal.

Circulating those documents is illegal?

Democracy dies in darkness, seems like the sun is setting in New Zealand.

useless_aether · 2020-03-07T22:21:27+00:00

found it, original leak: https://twitter.com/ActionZealandia/status/1236095230463508480

and news article:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12314759

useless_aether · 2020-03-07T21:41:30+00:00

i think you misspelled commie psy-op!

useless_aether · 2020-03-07T21:31:19+00:00

satire

idk tbh, but jacinda is a commie -> not to be trusted either way.

$14.88

have a look at the footnote

fruitjack · 2020-03-07T21:27:47+00:00

good, glad they're cracking down on their domestic terrorists.

dark_devil_dd · 2020-03-07T21:03:56+00:00

Debits for $14.88? Really? Shit, I need to check the exchange rate when I buy something so I don't accidentally do it.

Transactions at customisable printing stores, t-shirts?

Dude, I'm gonna need a link to the source to make sure it isn't satire.

useless_aether · 2020-03-05T13:53:21+00:00

but is chi for china and pit for pitbull?

Chipit · 2020-03-05T13:24:13+00:00

Read the comment again. Where did you get that I said the photo is fake? Seriously which sentence?

Speaking of the photo, do you see mashed pulp? Looks like individual bodies to me. What do you see?

Imagine putting a bear through a wood chipper. Do you think two hundred pounds of bone and meat would just wash down the drain?

useless_aether · 2020-03-05T06:04:18+00:00

so what you say is that the photo is fake?

Chipit · 2020-03-04T00:44:45+00:00

You can't wash hundreds of pounds of meat and bone down the drain. Easily debunked lies like this just hurt your cause.

JasonCarswell · 2020-02-03T23:41:30+00:00

Too late.

I'm not a kid.

And I have the pot. (Legal in Canada)

I would like a couple other things too but I'm broke and they're illegal and artificially expensive while funding covert agencies.

useless_aether · 2020-02-03T11:24:25+00:00

just say no to drugs, kids!

:-)

JasonCarswell · 2020-02-01T22:32:37+00:00

How do you really know then? Just try it. Just a bit. Cmon, you'll like it. All the kids are doing it. You'll see.

useless_aether · 2020-02-01T11:51:21+00:00

yes, but i am not an ex-commie

JasonCarswell · 2020-02-01T03:39:08+00:00

Are you speaking from experience? Are you an ex-commie?

useless_aether · 2020-01-29T19:59:14+00:00

nothing worse than being programmed by commies, that's for sure

JasonCarswell · 2020-01-29T17:13:36+00:00

Naw man, you got it wrong. You have a commie blind spot or commie bias or some kinda hangup. USA done programmed you gud.

There are very legit threats from capitalism, commies, and Agenda 21/Carbon Tax, but they're far from equivalent or identical.

Jesus · 2020-01-29T15:34:14+00:00

Doesn't Thunberg have connectiosn to the Rothschilds?

It was said that the Rothschilds were the King of the Kings rather than the King of the Jews, if that makes any sense.

Jesus · 2020-01-29T15:31:04+00:00

Climate change happens everyday, so when you call it climate change and say this change is because of some elitist plot, you look very deluded.

Marx was not that bad, as he wanted people to have power. He was more against the power of monopolies and the elite.

Marx was baptized and hated Judaism. THough he was brought up among a family of rabbis and Orthodox Jews, he found that Jews were the authors of usury which had taken a hold of all ends of the world. He writes this is one of his books concerning the Jewish Question. His communist manifesto was also written by Engles.

...at the Jesuit high school in Trier.

And what was this Jesuit high school? Why does your picture then have the Star of David on Marx, if he wasn't a Jew?

Greenhouse effect is real (water vapour), but CO2 has almost no influence on the climate. The sun does. From this poster I would never understand this.

Agreed!

People have destructive influence on the environment. Deforestation and pollution is real. This is not what the local humans do, but the big companies. Such big companies are also pushing the climate alarmism, as if they have something to hide.

Agreed!

Climate change propaganda does not seem to have anything to do with totalitarian communism. China has made no effort into reducing CO2 or whatever.

Agreed, somewhat, but when we look back on the climate change movement, many persons within said movement have ommunist affiliations. Also, the Club of Rome and the UN push these movements.

Normal Jews do not really promote Zionism. Most people do not even understand what this means, and just think that you are some neo-nazi.

60% of Jews are Zionists and the bible wirrten by Levitcal preists and Jewish elitists is based off land grabs and Zionism. Zionism as a religious pretext was created well before Herzl's political form as well as D'israel, who had a close relationship with the Rothschilds.

Globalization. People are fed too much bullshit, to know what that means to them. Most will think it is ok. As Globalization claims to help all people. In this case you mean that a global government will be established to "combat global warming", by installing global taxation that does not work at all. Except it helps big companies to have more monopolies.

Agreed! We are already in the New World Order. Do you have a credit card, how abut a social security number? It's here, the only real new world order that might come to fruition is that of a multilateral order where Israel sides with China and Russia. If a one world government does emerge it will only be for the benefit of a free market looting system for the multi-national corporations. Moeny talks and money flows, that's why EVERY COUNTRY is a corporation, including China, the US, and Israel. Even our congress is incorporated. All those that becoem members of the corporation must do what is in the best interests of the corporation, not the people.

And here we see that Marx would actually be against bringing more power to elites and big monopolies.

Exactly, Marx would be quite against the neoliberal austerity measures we see today. THe Bolshevik communism that emerged in Russia, was a foreign infiltration and instigated and funded by imperial powers to try to destroy an imperial Russia. A cgutted communist state, it was thought would then be used as a mnaufacturing hub for imeprial powers.

useless_aether · 2020-01-28T19:11:02+00:00

sorry, i was under the impression you are praising him? please disregard.

And why does Marx has anything to do with "climate change". He was dead long before this word existed.

the marxists at the united nations are responsible for climate alarmism. and the rothschilds who are related to marx and who are now also behind thunberg.

zyxzevn · 2020-01-28T18:36:33+00:00

Why do you say "beloved"?

And why does Marx has anything to do with "climate change". He was dead long before this word existed.

useless_aether · 2020-01-28T17:12:14+00:00

your beloved marx was a third cousin rothschild: http://archives.balliol.ox.ac.uk/Modern%20Papers/gelles/2018RothschildMarx.pdf

and a jesuit:

The quotations come from Talk With the German Author Emil Ludwig, December 13, 1931, First Published: Bolshevik, April 30, 1932, No. 8., Source: Works, J.V. Stalin, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1955, Volume 13, pp. 106-25--- https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1931/dec/13.htm Doubtlessly Stalin being brought up by Jesuits is a pivotal reason why he become such a sociopathic monster! Karl Marx, who's revolution Stalin would continue, like Stalin, was brought up by the Jesuits. (" Marx was an average student. He was educated at home until he was 12 and spent five years, from 1830 to 1835, at the Jesuit high school in Trier, at that time known as the Friedrich-Wilhelm Gymnasium." https://www.biography.com/scholar/karl-marx )

useless_aether · 2020-01-28T17:06:32+00:00

you too, i guess..

BorrowedLadder · 2020-01-28T16:30:14+00:00

Spend some time in the library

zyxzevn · 2020-01-28T16:12:25+00:00

Bad propaganda.

Replace Marx with Stalin next time.
Marx was not that bad, as he wanted people to have power. He was more against the power of monopolies and the elite.
Most people who see this, have no clue what this means. They will just think you have lost it.
Greenhouse effect is real (water vapour), but CO2 has almost no influence on the climate. The sun does. From this poster I would never understand this.
People have destructive influence on the environment. Deforestation and pollution is real. This is not what the local humans do, but the big companies. Such big companies are also pushing the climate alarmism, as if they have something to hide.
Agenda 21. Nobody knows what it is, except a few people in conspiracy circles. It is about depopulation, and people will not see it's relationship with climate change.
Climate change propaganda does not seem to have anything to do with totalitarian communism. China has made no effort into reducing CO2 or whatever.
David star. Zionism. This is a totally different subject. It is about the fact that the US is governed by Israel and money. It distracts from the whole idea of climate change and/or globalization. Maybe related to Agenda 21? Note: Normal Jews do not really promote Zionism. Most people do not even understand what this means, and just think that you are some neo-nazi.
Globalization. People are fed too much bullshit, to know what that means to them. Most will think it is ok. As Globalization claims to help all people. In this case you mean that a global government will be established to "combat global warming", by installing global taxation that does not work at all. Except it helps big companies to have more monopolies.

And here we see that Marx would actually be against bringing more power to elites and big monopolies.

useless_aether · 2020-01-21T17:15:28+00:00

mirror: https://pic8.co/sh/T4G8Kz.jpeg

useless_aether · 2020-01-15T21:51:35+00:00

mirror: https://pic8.co/sh/MBEeas.jpeg

bald-janitor · 2020-01-02T08:47:46+00:00

Chinese wisdom

useless_aether · 2020-01-02T07:44:13+00:00

not if they are commie colonizers. parasites

Robin · 2020-01-02T07:40:48+00:00

Building cities beats blowing them up.

useless_aether · 2020-01-01T23:04:15+00:00

push the blacks out of africa and into the west and make lebensraum for the chinese commies. two flies at the same time

zyxzevn · 2020-01-01T17:25:47+00:00

Have effectively only 2 parties...

Tiwaking · 2019-12-29T20:53:56+00:00

'Authoritarian turn'?? China has always been authoritarian. Its just the western world who decided to turn a blind eye.

Now the west is trying to admonish China for its bad behaviour?

They woke the sleeping dragon.

And its hungry.

VERY HUNGRY

Tiwaking · 2019-12-29T20:53:20+00:00

'Authoritarian turn'?? China has always been authoritarian. Its just the western world who decided to turn a blind eye.

Now the west is trying to admonish China for its bad behaviour?

They woke the sleeping dragon.

And its hungry.

VERY HUNGRY

Tiwaking · 2019-12-29T20:52:12+00:00

Thanks :D

useless_aether · 2019-12-29T20:30:07+00:00

ta

https://archive.is/OlNzL

Tiwaking · 2019-12-29T20:23:25+00:00

Trial

Not sure which package to choose?

Try full access for 4 weeks

$1.00 for 4 weeks*

Then $65.65 per month thereafter. Downgrade, change or cancel anytime during your trial

Jesus · 2019-12-21T23:17:35+00:00

Another PSYOP. Also, Trump, Cenk, and Sanders beleive the offical 9/11 lie.

JasonCarswell · 2019-12-19T08:26:29+00:00

The "Donation" Industrial Complex.

useless_aether · 2019-12-18T07:36:39+00:00

"donating"

JasonCarswell · 2019-12-18T05:39:12+00:00

A complex for donating organs.

useless_aether · 2019-12-13T09:04:31+00:00

unsubstantiated claim

black_hole_son · 2019-12-13T08:31:39+00:00

You were doing so well....but back to the shit posting I see.

useless_aether · 2019-11-19T14:20:12+00:00

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/18/asia/xinjiang-new-york-times-china-xi-intl-hnk/index.html

Jesus · 2019-11-18T06:47:08+00:00

Communism was crated and funded by the U.S. and bankers as a manufactuer hub. The Cold War was a fraud.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-11-17T20:55:49+00:00

Genocide?

That term is reserved for the native American Holocaust.

useless_aether · 2019-11-14T14:19:40+00:00

tell us everything you know!

useless_aether · 2019-11-14T14:09:52+00:00

why not? its about inner mongolia

useless_aether · 2019-11-14T07:55:33+00:00

hmm..

Tiwaking · 2019-11-14T07:30:13+00:00

I am constantly surprised that Laowhy and serpentza havent been put in jail yet with all of the video footage of the real China they have posted online

useless_aether · 2019-11-12T05:48:52+00:00

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/27/france-make-school-compulsory-age-three/

useless_aether · 2019-11-12T05:03:36+00:00

not when pedos are running the show. macron was in relationship with his templar teacher since age 13.

Cade_Connelly_13 · 2019-11-11T18:47:53+00:00

England is a Muslim outpost and France is right there with them. At least France isn't a surprise given how their asses have been kicked by so many different groups.

useless_aether · 2019-11-11T17:28:29+00:00

that too. i mean, they are destroying many things at the same time, all the time.

but when i think of it, in france, they must send children to school when they are only three years old. and they will completely brainwash them. its like a cult, but this time the state is a cult, and you just cant escape. poor kids. hope the yellow jackets will stop it though.

its no wonder, france was the first country the nwo/illuminati took over.

useless_aether · 2019-11-11T17:07:25+00:00

western/christian values (such as the family unit) must be destroyed to give way for the satanic, commie nwo.

critias · 2019-11-10T19:41:58+00:00

um...

hairyummy · 2019-11-05T03:27:59+00:00

Jews aren't white. If they were, they wouldn't be bringing third worlders into Europe.

useless_aether · 2019-11-04T16:14:33+00:00

for me, its the real-life one eye symbology thats so off-throwing

useless_aether · 2019-11-04T16:10:40+00:00

yeah. i agree with candace owens on many things

i also find it funny how the kkk is the military arm of the democratic party, yet the blacks traditionally vote democrat. crazy world.

Popper · 2019-11-04T15:48:32+00:00

you're right. Look at this MSM source

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/russian-documents-reveal-desire-sow-racial-discord-violence-u-s-n1008051

I think it is just dems trying to explain why african americans don't stay loyal to them and vote for them as much, must be muh russia!

useless_aether · 2019-11-04T14:57:20+00:00

& is a good boy!

communismwatch

MODERATORS

VERY HUNGRY

VERY HUNGRY