all 4 comments

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I read page 1, and 2, page three won't open for me.

My thoughts? We all should be brother's in arms against tyranny of any flavor that favors the monopoly, and oligarchy.

If true, that he only supports freedom, and not any certain form of government; then I'm good for an open free, and armed Republic.

As far as detention centers, and such, there should be a real investigation on who's funding these 'refugees' in mass. I've lived extensively in Central America; it's 3rd world in many shades; yet not too different than the States any longer. So let's find out who's doing the funding.

The southern US border should have illegal alien 'refuel' points, where by food ,and medical aid that's necessary to turn their illegal butts around, for their long journey home. That's fair.

Yet, screw the idea of these detention camps! We should be going after the prison industrial complex that has massive amounts of industry share, and are able to place, 'made in the USA' on the package/label, yet was made with literal slave labor.

These are the fuckers we should all go after, especially for those who're doing life for non-violent, and victimless crimes; I'm talking about the idiot that just wanted to get high.

Aside from that though, I don't think John Brown is any hero of mine; perhaps Quantrel, and his men that fought directly against those murderous jhawkers, but brown? Give me a break!

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I read page 1, and 2, page three won't open for me.

I don't know, I can view it just fine. original post

My thoughts? We all should be brother's in arms against tyranny of any flavor that favors the monopoly, and oligarchy.

No. There is not sufficient justification for an armed uprising at this time. I choose to prepare, but will not join in any effort to do violence.

If true, that he only supports freedom, and not any certain form of government; then I'm good for an open free, and armed Republic.

Sounds nice. I'd like a way to get there peacefully.

As far as detention centers, and such, there should be a real investigation on who's funding these 'refugees' in mass. I've lived extensively in Central America; it's 3rd world in many shades; yet not too different than the States any longer. So let's find out who's doing the funding.

Yes, absolutely. I expect it's mostly Democrats and Communists, probably with a few Republicans. The real question is who is coordinating the various interests. I mean, there is a real "deep state" which acts independent of all three branches of government. We know they influence events, but we can only guess at how and why.

One thing I've noticed is how drastically presidents change after entering office. The actual presidency of George W. Bush bore almost no resemblance to his campaign. Same for Obama. Are these men just villains who lie their way to power and then ...? Some would say "yes", but I have to wonder. Sure there was 9/11 and then the War on Terror, but I'm not convinced that explains the invasion of Iraq, and whatever the fuck is happening in Syria.

So we want to end war and have peace. We elect men who promise these things, and then do the opposite. Why?

The southern US border should have illegal alien 'refuel' points, where by food ,and medical aid that's necessary to turn their illegal butts around, for their long journey home. That's fair.

The Democrats made sure that can't happen by denying funds which could have theoretically provided for humanitarian needs.

Yet, screw the idea of these detention camps, I'm really gunning for the prison industrial complex that's has massive amounts of industry share, and are able to place, 'made in the USA' on the package/label, yet was made with literal slave labor.

That's a big deal for sure. It's not practical to empty the prisons though. The fraction of truly violent individuals have to be dealt with, and I don't want them executed en masse.

These are the fuckers we should all go after, especially for those who're doing life for non-violent, and victimless crimes; I'm talking about the idiot that just wanted to get high.

Of course. Don't forget though that prison makes hardened criminals from ordinary people.

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When I said, 'brothers in arms', I wasn't calling for armed insurrection, more so along the lines of the Warrior Poet Society. Meaning always do the right thing, try to be 'there', when another is in need.

As far as presidents go, I believe Eisenhower when he said they were 'selected' rather than 'elected'. Case in point, 2 elections back, and maybe the one before it, Ron Paul ran for president; he would've had great points, had they not kept cutting him off.

The second Trump had a debate, my god, that was entertaining, I wanted to watch more, and at that point thinking on Eisenhower, I thought, he's 'the guy' selected. They never cut him off.

As far as prisons, and crazies, look around, they're bringing in the refugees; what's their culture? It's definitely different, and we aren't vetting them, so how many are literal enemy fighters? Our educational system has taken a shit, and people are more, and more ignorant bordering on stupid. It really is getting bad, and I'd recommend to all, get a gun, carry a gun. If you don't like guns, invest in, and learn self defense; keep all the skills up, and going.

Here's an interesting article I've read half way through, it's a description of life in Vietnam today, and how this person views America, and what they think we as Americans should do. http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=191511

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When I said, 'brothers in arms', I wasn't calling for armed insurrection, more so along the lines of the Warrior Poet Society. Meaning always do the right thing, try to be 'there', when another is in need.

I'm not a commie. It is every rational man's duty to protect his own life. Choosing not to protect your own life and then demanding others protect you is anti-human and anti-life (suicide).

As far as presidents go, I believe Eisenhower when he said they were 'selected' rather than 'elected'.

I have heard that before, but I don't believe it was Eisenhower.

\