you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (30 children)

[removed]

    [–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

    Public Service Announcement:

    SOCKS IS THE ENEMY WITHIN

    socks is historically provably a liar, a prolific timesuck sealion, an authoritarian kiss ass, a mindless corporate media propaganda regurgitator, a big pharma shill, and he/she/they/it refuses to acknowledge the corruption inherent in the entire system, including his/her/their beloved Democrats.

    None of this is new.
    Why do I bring it up?
    Yesterday's chat topic: "5th generation warfare demands counter-efforts."
    Today's bitch post.

    Will socks respond again despite claiming several times to have blocked me? Will I care? Nope.

    We must resist the class war from every angle, at every level, from our little pathetic socks, up beyond the ceiling.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

    So you're just going to cut and paste stupid comments like this that are unrelated to the threads or posts? You need help....

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    I thought you blocked me.

    Go fuck yourself shilly, or better: just leave SaidIt.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    What - another rmoronic comment? So much mental illness in my inbox today. Yes, you will be blocked. No worries.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Since you've blocked me I guess you get out of revealing your source of shill income.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    accute paranoid schizophrenia today, eh

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Big words for a shill who can't even see the damage his "leaders" are doing.

    [–]Drewski 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    Jason, I rarely agree with socks and I'll grant that their posts are often made in poor faith. Unlike some of the obvious trolls, I haven't blocked them because I think Saidit should be a place of open discourse and debate. In this instance they make a good point; the data is being misrepresented and the side effects are stated in a way that makes them seem more serious. If you read the article, it really is low quality and contains a lot of hyperbole. As a Covid jab skeptic myself, we should all be calling out low quality information like this because it doesn't support our position.

    Look, I understand your frustration but replies like this are not doing anything productive. There are always going to be those that disagree with us, trolls, disrupters, state sponsored shills and other bad actors, and people that genuinely have a different perspective. I'd rather err on the side of free speech, and counter them with quality debate rather than censorship. I appreciate all your contributions to Saidit and have learned a lot from the content and comments you've shared. That said, replies like this are low pyramid and aren't contributing anything positive to the Saidit community. I'm not letting socks off the hook as many of their posts here are also ad hominem, but in this case you've instigated it and it isn't productive. If their posts are bothering you this much you should probably block them so you don't have to see them.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    [...] As a Covid jab skeptic myself, we should all be calling out low quality information like this because it doesn't support our position.

    Agreed. To be clear, I didn't support nor attack the OP.

    I selected these comments because it's a high visibility post including socks' selective shilling - and I'm currently able to spend a little time on SaidIt, unlike much of the last several weeks and months. I realize I should have chosen a better post to battle on and aim to do better in the future. My triggered fingers got itchy and careless.

    _There are always going to be those that disagree with us, trolls, disrupters, state sponsored shills and other bad actors, and people that genuinely have a different perspective.

    Most of that is not a problem for me. It's the prolific vast quantities of bad faith that rubs folks the wrong way, not just me but also others who publicly and privately support my objections.

    No one has time to perpetually battle them, and that stuff gets tedious, not just for them and readers, but also for me. I do what I can, when I'm able, so that it's more like random waves that might erode or jar them loose to drift away from SaidIt. It's also a reminder to SaidIt users, new and old, to take socks with a grain of shill. If we can't get socks banned at least we can keep the bad faith turd on his back foot.

    I'd rather err on the side of free speech, and counter them with quality debate rather than censorship.

    Agreed, but not for timesuck sealions abusing our good faith patience. My generosity for socks expired a loooong time ago. Nothing he does is good.

    replies like this are low pyramid and aren't contributing anything positive to the Saidit community.

    Agreed and mostly. How would you feel about a polite revised "Public Service Announcement" to caution against believing socks? Feel free to draft one up for discussion and tweaking improvements towards a consensus knowing that I and maybe others may copypasta it around to label socks' content in lieu of metatags or other warnings. This may be an effective tack worth following.

    I'm not letting socks off the hook as many of their posts here are also ad hominem, but in this case you've instigated it and it isn't productive.

    I'd say it's more like a perpetual inter-reaction, like an infinite thermite burn melting to the Earth's core.

    If their posts are bothering you this much you should probably block them so you don't have to see them.

    Some time ago, socks yielded and claimed to block me. Obviously this changed. socks doesn't affect me, but it does bother me that their endless bullshit will reach susceptible minds.

    Thanks for the constructive input/feedback.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

    67% reported at least one phenomenon, and most of the symptoms passed after 3-1 days

    Good call shills

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

    [Edit ...] Yes, I think the question for the survey, and the results are all fishing for a click-bait story - because nearly everyone should fall in the category of 'I experienced one of the phenomena' after the vaccine.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    I'm agreeing with you, it was a good call. This is a shit story and perverted the small survey's results. You pasted the crux of it, thank you for translating it.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    Holy mackerel. I think I'm done with the internet today....

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    Of course you are still a shill, and if this happened to be well cited and evidenced, I'm sure you would find a way to deny it or talk circles around it.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    You know how vaccines work.

    Yes, they are indeed quite effective at killing, maiming, and injuring countless innocents - to serve the ruling class' depopulation UN Agenda 2030.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    As if it's a left-right issue.

    socks = status quo gimp

    The unthinking shill blindly cites nothing but corporate media propaganda begging, "Govern me harder, Daddy!!!"

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    Visit those websites. Get your learn on.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    I'll visit them after you start taking non-corporate media propaganda seriously, authoritarian sealioning big pharma shill liar.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    I'll visit them after you start taking non-corporate media propaganda seriously,

    OK - done, sorted

    Now read....

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    sucks, always lying. Shilly wabbit, Trix are for kids.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Follow the money.

    Then tell us, where does your money come from?

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

    certainly not from the Santa disability fund

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Then besides the obvious cognitive dissonance, tell us what disability you do have that grants you the income and the luxury of prolifically spewing your ignorance, propaganda, and blind faith in authority and big pharma all over SaidIt.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    yawn

    more insults, from Santa no less

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    You won't even get coal.
    You authoritarians are systemically destroying the energy supply networks, along with the economy, and food supplies.

    SOCKS IS THE ENEMY WITHIN.

    [–]fschmidt 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    How much do they pay you for your great work supporting eugenics? These eugenic holocausts have been good for the Jewish gene pool. Whether it's getting on the train or taking the shot, removing those willing increases the average intelligence.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    This has absolutely nothing to do with the post or my comment.

    [–]tyranicaloverlord 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    More misleading material from two anti-vax propaganda sites.

    It's not an anti-vax site when they are not talking about he vaccine. Do not accept the "new" definition of vaccines. mRNA is NOT a vaccine.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Do not accept the "new" definition of vaccines. mRNA is NOT a vaccine.

    You can't redefine the word, 'vaccine', merely because of one of its components. Let's say 99.9% of scientists and virologists are wrong, may I refer to you as my source for this new definition?