all 12 comments

[–]infocom6502 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

so this looks like a silly dude, but can you explain what is going on?? i don't quite get it.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Crisis actors are paid to pretend like they are suffering, in this case from Delta COVID, in order to drum up fear and hysteria in the public who watch corporate media news and believe the propaganda.

[–]infocom6502 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

ok, thanks. that matches well with the 2nd pic which I didn't notice the first time I looked at this tweet.

pic #3

Now I wonder how common this is. Is this also a crisis actor:

https://us.yahoo.com/news/24-year-old-who-needed-double-lung-transplant-wishes-hed-been-vaccinated-for-covid-19-180810400.html ??

I guess we'll likely never know for sure.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I'm aware of several crisis actor events, including Boston bombing, Sandy Hook, Florida Gay nightclub, and others. I also know some events have real victims, and some events may have actors AND victims (9/11, Vegas?, etc.).

They would rather have us believe it's a conspiracy theory:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=crisis+actor

But there's WAAAAY too much info to prove it's true:
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=crisis%20actor&kind=video

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Crisis_actor

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=crisis+actor

[–]infocom6502 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

well, sandy definitely had real victims.

this was ages ago and my memory is foggy, but i think when i looked into it i concluded it was definitely real, but the press (or some corrupt entity) also used crisis actors in order to fully exploit this mega-tragedy.

I think this is sort of the default. Real tragedies, but rely on crisis actors to fully exploit such crises (whether they were natural or planned/collaborated by those carrying out their agenda). With real victims, it's a nervous wild card for the PR agencies. They can't guarantee anything that will come from a natural interview; they like scripts.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

well, sandy definitely had real victims.

Proof?

So far I've seen NONE. And I've looked hard.

Yes, there's a lot of misinformation on all sides. But there is also undeniable evidence stacked up high that the "event" was staged in a VERY sketchy environment - with VERY sketchy media divisive coverage and overblown political reactions.

If they can lie so hard about wars, 9/11, and now COVID and stick so hard to their manufactured narratives, why would you think they wouldn't do it for a school shooting?

[–]infocom6502 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I'm very stale on the topic and probably am not going to pour a lot of time into researching Sandy Hook in the near future.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I am stale now too. Years ago I did some deep diving though, enough to be thoroughly convinced that it among MANY other crisis events before and since the 2013 NDAA are psyops. Almost everything the corporate media presents is either a lie or spun to be inverted.

[–]Froglich 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Is the video of this interview available?

The top right image is goofy.
The guy looks like a CG rendering, where they detail-supersaturated the image. Idk

Deep faking crisis actors will be a propaganda nightmare.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I doubt you'd need to deep fake it when you've got endless real dumb people desperate to get famous for 15 seconds.

I don't know about original footage. The comments under that go on for quite a while and though there were lots of links I didn't follow any.

[–]Froglich 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Deep fakes would be ideal for hoaxes. No witnesses.
No history.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You'd need at least one computer savvy animator and possibly a team including I.T. If they were smart they'd have their asses covered with a dead man's switch. Most people wouldn't bother, but anyone working on faked testimonies might have to ask themselves why.

Right now, it's easier to hire stupid actors who don't have tech skills or conspiracy tendencies to better control them.

Now or soon, you may want to hire a Luddite make-up artist to distort their features.

In the future deep fakes will become much easier.

IMO, it's not worth the trouble. The deep state lies openly anyway. People will soon by dying in profound proportions thus "validating" the COVID-hysteria and you'll either believe the scientism or the actual science more strongly than ever - and thus the "evidence" will not sway those who have die-hard / die-easy beliefs. Clever manipulations really. It would be nice to re-work this shit into a screenplay.