Completely normal tribunal in the UK

submitted by jet199 from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (26 children)

Soon judges won't know what the meaning of "is" is, and everyone will be blinded by perpetual confusion, unable to think a single clear thought. Or that's what some social engineers seem to want to happen.

Lots of people see what what is going on, and aren't putting up with it.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

In my more cynical moments, I'm halfway to believing that the whole TRA push is just a massive psyop designed to train people. If they can be trained to accept such an obvious lie as men can be women (and vice versa) in the face of all evidence to the contrary, then they'll accept other lies just as big and obvious.

[–]Jiminy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

2+2=5

If you not just say this but believe it in your brain, they've won. And they own you more than they could ever own a slave.

[–]LtGreenCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

It often looks to me like all of this Clown World shit is some sort of psyop. Culture doesn't change that quickly. But then I reflect and realize that a psyop that massive would need Illuminati-like levels of airtight incognito social engineering. I guess it's more likely we're just seeing an unprecedented mass-stupidity event on a scale that humanity has never seen before.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed, it's just part of the mass cultural breaking and it's intentional. They want people focused on nonsense so they can't contemplate any real problems. It's a convenient divide-and-conquer issue that pushes a lot of people's buttons and grabs people's attention so they don't have time and attention to spare on anything truly meaningful.

All they have to do is own the 6 major media companies to control the narrative for the overwhelming majority.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Never seen before? You must not have studied history. Lobotomy? Witch burning? Child sacrifices? Nazism? Humans always lose their shit in times of crisis. What you see here is NOTHING.

[–]LtGreenCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Those were geographically relegated phenomena and hence small-scale by comparison. And you're also talking about individual instances of insanity that happened incongruently.

The scale we're looking at here would be like if suddenly lobotomies, witch burning, and child sacrifices, and 30 other crazy things all started happening simultaneously and all over the world. That's why it's called Clown World. Lots of different stupidities happening at once and all over.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

geographically relegated phenomena

Ah yes, the geographically relegated phenomena of World Wars and witch-hunts. You are 200% American. No other country is that ignorant. Did you also think history began in 1492?

By the way, some incels wearing dresses and harassing women is definitely bad, but I'll take THAT over lobotomy, witch-hunt or nazism.

[–]LtGreenCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Holy shit you're still going. Okay for one, you didn't even mention world wars in your original comment. Secondly, yes there were multiple witch hunts throughout history but they happened at different times and independent from each other. All you've done is nitpick a few points and didn't even do it well. You've added nothing of value to the conversation. All you've given us is tunnel-vision criticism of an innocuous thought that nobody really gives a shit about.

I normally avoid personal attacks but god damn, every time I see you, you are an arrogant caviling incessant quibbler at every turn. I don't know if you're autistic or have some kind of personality disorder or something, or if you just like to argue for the sake of argument but do me a favor and at least drop the arrogant attitude next time because when you're arrogant on top of willfully myopic it just makes you look like a dumbass.

[–]wylanderuk 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are probably about to be called a "misogynistic incel" within the next 24 hours...

[–]salesman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Let's keep the conversation respectful and focused on the topic at hand.

[–]LtGreenCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I give everybody a default level of respect and never instigate, even often when that respect is not returned. But I do have my limits.

[–]twoeggspam 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Respect is a two-way street. It's important to respect others, but it's also important to demand respect in return. If someone consistently disrespects you, it's okay to set boundaries and distance yourself from them.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's.... a bit hard to tone down the arrogance when the person you're talking to is a deranged idiot. But, you know what? I'll do it. I am 200000% sure that the other side of the conversation will keep screeching and spewing random nonsense. Because that's how this website works. But we need a test, right.

[–]LtGreenCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think you'd be happier with the people at ovarit.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah. I tried. They won't let me in. They say I hate women and I'm a men's rights activist.

[–]wylanderuk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's.... a bit hard to tone down the arrogance when the person you're talking to is a deranged idiot.

We know, but we keep interacting with you AKA the deranged idiot in question.

[–]tfret 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Engaging with someone we know is deranged may seem counterintuitive, but it's important to address and challenge their harmful beliefs.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

In retrospect the witch hunts were necessary, there really was a movement using mostly women that were trying to sabotage civilization. We see it again today with things like Hillary's spirit cooking.

[–]QueenBread 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ah, you're the one who in another comment explained you want male rapists to be in female prisons. Too bad you're behind a keyboard, because I'd love to laugh in your pathetic face.

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree with that

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

...I mean, they did say no binaria and no binario, which is kind of fair to use for important things (no binaria for enby-affiliated women, binario for enby-affiliated men), so there COULD be a kernel of sanity there.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think that was more pointing out the insanity of applying non-binary nonsense to a language that has a gender distinction for applying non-binary nonsense.

[–]AriShekelsteinDDS 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

“We aren’t coming after your children”

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bill Clinton started the arguing about what "is" means