My Research on Gender Dysphoria Was Censored. But I Won’t Be. Retraction of scientific articles is associated with well-deserved shame: plagiarism, lying, etc. But my article was not retracted for any shameful reason. It was retracted because it provided evidence for an idea that activists hate.

submitted by Chipit from thefp.com

all 18 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]binaryblob 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I think if you tell enough people they might be transgender some of them will get their dicks cut off. If, on the other hand, you had never told them there was such a thing, they would never have come up with the idea to do so.

As such spreading transgender ideas should be similarly viewed as infecting people with HIV on purpose.

[–]TitsAndWhiskeyPronoun: My Nigga 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

This exactly. Growing up, it wasn’t even an option. If we had said something about hating being a boy or a girl, we would’ve been told, “sorry, that’s just the way it is.”

We were bound to biological reality.

Now, we outright ask very young children if they want to be a boy or a girl. It’s fucking sick.

[–]binaryblob 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

We could also ask children (or adults, because why stop at children?) whether they want to be beautiful or ugly and see how many children want to reenact Face/Off.

[–]TitsAndWhiskeyPronoun: My Nigga 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Fuck it, just ask 5 year old boys if they want to be dinosaurs.

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

At 5 years old? My little ass would have quite happily been Godzilla, after having seen a weekend kaiju movie marathon that introduced me to the big lizard (and King Kong too, for that matter).

[–]TitsAndWhiskeyPronoun: My Nigga 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Man, you should sue your parents for discriminating against your lived truth.

Trans lizards are lizards!

[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, I said ping pong balls. Anybody remember that punchline?

[–]LordoftheFliesAmeri-kin 2.0. Pronouns: MegaWhite/SuperStraight/UltraPatriarchy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nope.

[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's just as well.

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Spreading transgenderism is the equivalent of cigarette ads.

[–]ClassroomPast6178 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Michael Bailey, the author of the linked piece, is the researcher that Deborah Soh has written extensively about in her book The End of Gender, he almost had his life wrecked by TRAs and their psychotic obsession to cover up the truth about AGP.

His retracted article on ROGD was an excellent replication of the original ROGD study by Littman but I’m not surprised that it was attacked because ROGD, like AGP is to MTF troons, is the dirty secret of FTM troonettes.

[–]xoenix 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't quite understand the technicality that was used to retract the paper. They say he didn't acquire consent to publish, he says he did. Author has 40 years experience in research, so I wonder how he missed this.

[–]Q-Continuum-kin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The journal will probably claim they need a signed consent form. The scientist basically put it in as part of the survey. (By submitting this survey you are consenting to etc etc)

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your research? Are you the researcher OP?

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's a quote from the article, genius.

[–]bucetao6969Ace Spectrum 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's why you use quotes: ""

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Don't be dumb

[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Keep submitting it to other journals. Re the mock paper "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" about which authors Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt claim that some humanities journals will publish anything as long as it has "the proper leftist thought" and quoted (or was written by) well-known leftist thinkers: All Things Considered, 1996. The quote is in an interview on the Sokal Affair that embarrassed a prominent academic journal for publishing a parody paper on postmodernism that made it through the peer review process. The reason, imo, was that no one really understood what postmodernism was anyway. I say this to mock academic journals. Good luck to you.