you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

You're not fucking understanding that some of us can EASILY pick socks out in a crowd and could easily build a solid case up - BEFORE any trial or action is taken.

It's exactly like the anti-American bot. Swatting it makes it stop for a while. That's the fucking point.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

No, the Americans bot always comes back instantly. Now I often just remove its spam and don't even bother with banning it.

I also don't trust that you can pick socks out. People seem to think every single leftist on this site MUST be a socks alt. In reality I think the libs are just so cultish that it's hard to tell them apart. But many of those "socks alts" do have slightly different opinions and behaviors. Even if "everyone knew" it's socks, that's still not enough to prove it.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

It wouldn't surprise me if the anti-American bot has learned to avoid spamming my posts, as I always report them. I said early on that we should just let it go under one good name and at least have everyone be aware of that name. One of them was particularly apt. Also, with a consistent name, there surely would be a way to automate a comment-deleting script.

You don't have to trust that I can pick socks out. Get everyone who interacts with him. NO! Not every leftist is socks. Stop being as fucking retarded as too many people on here are. HongKongPhooey, I, and a few others are obviously far more acutely aware of socks, and we're fucking honest about whether we're certain or not. Plus, socks is in chat daily and always confirms and outs himself above and beyond his obvious-to-some "style" of interaction.

In reality I think the libs are just so cultish that it's hard to tell them apart.

In reality they are are indeed cultish - and you and others are too daft to tell them apart when clearly there are huge differences.

Even if he admits it in chat it's not "proof". Fuck that. Ban the fucker when it's clear. Stop being a goddamn pussy. It's not about different opinions. There's no shortages of them here and I've never called for them to be banned. No matter how much socks may cry victim, he is not.

Ultimately it's pure laziness not to do it, or come up with a creative solution that would meet whatever lame bullshit standards you claim to have, when we clearly already know, or will find out over time - as by then it's obvious and it will also be tremendously obvious that YOU are defending someone who's harming SaidIt, socks or not - but is definitely socks.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I and many others do not believe that several of the people everyone thinks are socks are him. They think dicknipples and u/ActuallyNot are both socks, but a quick look at both of them and you can clearly see that dicknipples has a MUCH more aggressive and rude tone. You yourself know that, but you are in the minority. Most of this site thinks every single leftist is socks.

I think dicknipples may indeed be socks, but there's no grounds to ban him without proof, simply because I suspect him. It'll have to wait until he causes trouble, and then he'd get banned whether he's socks or not.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

I and many others do not believe that several of the people everyone thinks are socks are him.

Correct. I already stated so. That's why I'm calling for socks/dicknipples to be banned and not ActuallyNot or the others, though I wouldn't mind, though it wouldn't be "fair".

You're denying the abundance evidence for no fucking good reason other than to draw out the drama. Stop wasting my time and read my statements. SOME of us are MUCH more discerning and capable, and know the tells of sock alts. Don't listen to the retarded accusators who back it up with nothing. HKP and I, and others, can point out how and why. We KNOW dicknipples is socks. Fact. Endlessly proven in chat and comments. We will admit we don't know all his other alts. You're essentially calling us liars by ignoring us and/or think your judgement is superior to ours. Go fuck yourself - or better, do your job and ban dicknipples. It fucking long overdue.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm not calling you liars. It's just not enough proof to warrant a ban.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm calling him a liar. I'm not dicknipples. And I'm not socks.

Furthermore it's obvious from the dialect of English that we use that we're not the same person. Even someone with as poor critical thinking as Carswell can tell that I'm not dicknipples.

He's lying. Moreover none of his comments raise the discussion of the pyramid of debate. He's been poisoning the debate in here for as long as I've been visiting. Carswell should be banned. It's fucking long overdue.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He doesn't think you're him.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're too lazy to look at the mountains of evidence and come to the obvious conclusion.
Or you're defending a villain.
Or you think your ethics don't stink.
Regardless, go fuck yourself.

[–]Alphix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They can't even get it through their thick skulls that I am the epitome of trustworthy. So disappointing. You're right, they're fucking blind.