you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I figured you would. Don't they make it obvious why square monitors aren't used? When you have to fit a rectangle inside a square you lose a lot of room.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Doesn't matter what the shape, I'd use it to the max. Square, widescreen, ultra-widescreen, etc.

Ultimately I'd guess it's about demand. Square monitors would be just as good for tiling too, for large theatrical spaces - though with lockdown there's not much demand for clubs and such.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Dude.... When you have to fit a rectangle inside a square you lose a lot of room. You make your display smaller. Thus a square aspect ratio is not desirable when it would force content with different aspect ratios smaller and shittier.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Dude... I know. When you fit a square in a rectangle you lose a lot too. Or a tall rectangle in a wide rectangle or vice versa. I'm talking about more than just watching videos.

For example, I have my 3 1080p monitors vertically tall, yet my full screen browser (ie. SaidIt) is crowded with vertical tabs, not even with sidebars (bookmarks) or widgets (clock, calendar, todo list), etc. A square monitor would solve that. Making them horizontal could fit it, but then my scroll is short and squat. I would MUCH rather have 2 large 1920x1920 square monitors than 3 1080x1920 monitors - plus my 4th bigger screen to the side for videos only.