you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 15 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

They really do need a flowchart to keep track of their own bullshit, don't they?

[–]reluctant_commenter 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Okay lol I actually was thinking the other day of making a flowchart of TQ+ arguments, seriously! Like this, but for gender identity beliefs: https://i.imgur.com/CRLq0Y8.jpg

That^ flowchart challenges the three fundamental assumptions of Christianity: That "God" is 1. loving 2. omnipresent 3. omniscient. One would have to identify similar core beliefs held in transgender ideology about gender identity in order to reproduce a similar structure.

But honestly, even just having a flowchart to keep track of their crazy bullshit would be useful.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I really do love this flowchart but it does assume that Ultimate Reality has a rational structure when it clearly does not. Most "serious" Christians (i.e. ones whose commitment I respect) would acknowledge the ultimate Mystery that lies beyond anything you can say rationally about God.

I am not a Christian, I am a polytheist who believes in a single Creation Principle ("God" for all intents and purposes) that lies beyond good vs. evil dichotomy. Even the rank-and-file deities lie beyond good/evil dichotomies, they tend to be either helpful or not helpful depending upon your own personal characteristics and circumstances. And, in my experience, if you call upon a particular deity to grant certain beneficial qualities, you typically succeed in obtaining/manifesting those qualities, but you also end up manifesting circumstances in which those qualities are required. So it's a double-edged sword.