all 13 comments

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 26 insightful - 7 fun26 insightful - 6 fun27 insightful - 7 fun -  (2 children)

He compared hand sizes with you while tripping on shrooms? Sweetheart, that's not flirting. He was high, not horny for you.

[–]julesburm1891 20 insightful - 12 fun20 insightful - 11 fun21 insightful - 12 fun -  (1 child)

I once threw my arm around a guy at a bar to tell him how much he looked like Buddy Holly. Unlike OP, he was able to discern that I was just high af and not hitting on him.

[–]Datachost 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Oh damn, you met Rivers Cuomo in a bar?

[–]jiljol 29 insightful - 1 fun29 insightful - 0 fun30 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Funny how transgender people stating their boundaries ("don't call me this", "don't touch me there", etc) is considered sacrosanct, but when gay people state our "boundaries" (actually just our homosexuality) it becomes an invitation to try and tear them down.

[–]soundsituationI myself was once a gay 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Compelling people to use pronouns that don't reflect one's sex isn't setting a boundary, though. Boundaries by definition can only be defensive. The only way way something like this could be truly defensive, self-protective establishment of boundaries would be like if the trans-identified person decided that they wouldn't be friends with someone who didn't use their preferred pronouns. That's completely their prerogative. Compelled speech isn't.

Also, "don't touch me there" isn't analogous to "don't call me that". "Don't touch me there" doesn't necessitate that the person touches you elsewhere; they can just not touch you at all. But "don't call me that" does necessitate that people call you something else.

[–]reluctant_commenter 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Boundaries by definition can only be defensive.

Such a simple statement, but honestly that's so true and I think that's at the heart of many people's misunderstandings over the word "boundary".

[–]TiredTrendersSuper-gay 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The trans community's tried and true "rules for thee but not for me" method as per usual.

[–]GreykittymommaMagical lady 💜 17 insightful - 10 fun17 insightful - 9 fun18 insightful - 10 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah she... I mean 'he' doesn't sound like a pathetic woman at all 😂

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Gonna sound like gay grandpa here with a maybe-unpopular opinion that reflects the insensitivity of my generation and years ... but both OP and their roommate sound young and stupid.

Gay roommie is playing with fire, shouldn't be surprised when he gets burned.

[–]reluctant_commenter 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Eh, I agree with you up to a point. I think it's kind of sad that this gay guy couldn't be physically affectionate (in a pretty minor way) with a female friend without her interpreting it as hitting on her, even despite him clearly stating and explaining his sexuality.

Also, lol'd at "gay grandpa."

[–]Hannibalboy93 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

TLC creep "so I creep yeahhhhh, keep it on the down low" you know that song

[–]reluctant_commenter 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He's mentioned before how he's not attracted to vaginas/people with vaginas and I want to respect that

Then respect it. And anyway, why would you waste your time trying to date someone who literally says they will never be attracted to you?