you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Trolley 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I legitimately do not understand what the author of the graphic is arguing. Seems like he or she is saying that if you're born female and also attracted to females you're a transperson? I thought that simply made you a lesbian.

What am I missing?

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is the new talking point: gay people aren't real, we're really just trans people in denial.

This is their answer to our criticism that they are transing gay kids.

[–]Trolley 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oof. Thank you for helping me understand.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What am I missing?

Gender role rules, I think. Or, rather, you're dismissing them automatically, as everyone should-- because these rules are so manifestly stupid.

According to gender roles (aka sex stereotypes), only males can be female-attracted, and vice-versa. So female-attracted people MUST be male. It's reasoning on a preschool level. Or, these days, an Iran/trans one, apparently. Kind of cute when little kids think this way (because they're powerless, and naturally don't know any better); but when otherwise-intelligent adults do, in vast numbers? Fuckin' terrifying.

[–]Trolley 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for the insight. It truly would be almost endearing if it wasn't so invidious.