ViolenceThe right side of history showing their compassion by trying set lesbians on fire

submitted by spanishprofanity from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 31 insightful - 6 fun31 insightful - 5 fun32 insightful - 6 fun -  (17 children)

Les femmes trans sont des femmes. Les lesbiennes, on doit nos droits aux travailleur.e.s du sexe trans et racisé.e.s, vous l'oubliez trop souvent. Merci à elles de rendre cette pride plus safe.

Ugh, have the French forgotten their own history now to just rely on a bad revision of American history? Napoleon is the one who legalized same-sex attraction back in 1791 almost 200 fucking years before an American gay man and drag queen didn't start a riot.

Can we just stop importing American shit to Europe?

[–]MilkTea 24 insightful - 30 fun24 insightful - 29 fun25 insightful - 30 fun -  (0 children)

I can't believe the brick Marsha P. Johnson threw landed all the way to France.

[–]spanishprofanity[S] 18 insightful - 12 fun18 insightful - 11 fun19 insightful - 12 fun -  (1 child)

Don'tcha know that Marsha P.'s heroic and selfless act of throwing the first brick liberated gays from all around the world? 🤡🌍

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 8 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Nous sommes tous Marsha maintenant!

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can we just stop importing American shit to Europe?

Believe me, I would love for that to stop. Unfortunately, European liberals will keep doing this. It’s very ironic that European liberals hate on America and call American culture inferior, and then try to bring the very worst aspects of American culture into European countries. But after WWII, America had a lot of power and influence over Europe, especially Western Europe, and that’s how America-centric European liberals became what they are today. It’s also why there is growing anti-American sentiment among nationalist groups across the continent, and why so many of these groups are pro-Russia or pro-China or both.

And it’s not just liberals. A lot of European conservatives try to initiate American culture, completely oblivious to where European liberals get their bad influences from. Now, I don’t hate America, America is a beautiful country with a lot to offer. And America has done a lot of good for the world as well. Plus, I blame European liberals and conservatives for importing American culture, not Americans, because these European traitors are the ones who are changing European countries to the detriment of European identities.

EDIT: For those who don’t understand French: this is what the text said:

Trans women are women. Lesbians, we owe our rights to trans and racialized sex workers, you too often forget. Thank you to them for making this pride safer.

[–]xanditAGAB (Assigned Gay at Birth) 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Napoleon is the one who legalized same-sex attraction back in 1791

never heard that one... and i pre-date marsha p christ as saviour.

[–][deleted] 23 insightful - 1 fun23 insightful - 0 fun24 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Napoleon also forced his legal code, legalizing homosexuality, into Netherlands, Belgium, and Luxembourg. Switzerland as well, but Switzerland banned it again after regaining independence from France.

So, yes, Napoleon did way more for gay rights than Malcolm Michaels Jr. ever did. It might have been mostly to piss off the pope, but he did it.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don’t forget the microstates of Monaco and Andorra. They too legalised homosexuality in the late 18th century because of Napoleon. And the influence of his legal code eventually spread to Italy, Spain, most of Latin America, Turkey, San Marino and even Vatican City, although Spain would later ban homosexuality again from 1954 until 1979.

If Ireland was annexed by France instead of Britain, we probably would have decriminalised homosexuality around the same time as France, but instead we didn’t do it until 1993.

[–]Destresse🇨🇵 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Homosexuality was penalised again in France after World War... two, I think. The law was against "inappropriate public behaviours" though, lol. So the discrimination is invisible. It got tweaked multiple times, I don't remember which president finally removed homosexuality from "inappropriate public behaviours."

Sad when fellow countrymen and women think the Americans gave us our rights lol

[–]reluctant_commenter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It might have been mostly to piss off the pope, but he did it.

I mean, I can get behind that, lol.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Quite apart from nutters wielding road flares, what bothers me most about this is the absolute fucking butchering of the French language in the name of inclusivity.

racisé.e.s

travailleur.e.s

Not for the first time I find myself agreeing with the Académie on this issue:

La multiplication des marques orthographiques et syntaxiques qu’elle induit aboutit à une langue désunie, disparate dans son expression, créant une confusion qui confine à l’illisibilité. On voit mal quel est l’objectif poursuivi et comment il pourrait surmonter les obstacles pratiques d’écriture, de lecture – visuelle ou à voix haute – et de prononciation. Cela alourdirait la tâche des pédagogues. Cela compliquerait plus encore celle des lecteurs.

The multiplication of orthographic and syntactic marks that it ['inclusive' writing] creates results in a discordant language, disparate in its expression and confused to the point of illegibility. It is difficult to see what the point is and how it will overcome the practical difficulties of writing, reading - both visually and aloud - and pronunciation. This will increase the burden on teachers, not to mention readers.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I was about to say "Thank god gendered languages don't use bullshit 'inclusive' language"...

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh my sweet summer child.

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

:l

[–]Destresse🇨🇵 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah, this started because when we're kids we're taught "masculine wins over feminine" as a way to remember that an adjective will always be masculine as long as there is 1 male subject in the sentence. 100 female subjects and 1 male - > adjective will be male gendered.

I get the intention, but our language wasn't always like this. Before, it was which noun was last that "won" the adjective. A man and a woman are.... - > female gendered adjective. A woman and a man are.... - > male gendered adjective. It would solve the issue if we went back to this. Plus it sounds better to the ear.

I'm not too fond of inclusive writing. It's a hassle. But it's the norm in left-leaning universities and feminist articles/blogs/writings. It hasn't caught on further than that though.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wasn't aware of that. I think that proves to be a rather elegant solution.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It hasnt caught on because its a massive hassle and one of the requirements to use this bastardized form speech is to live in an ivory tower and huff your own farts via gas mask.