you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think the issue with Dumbledore is that it feels like he was retroactively made gay. Naturally, it would've been awful if he was "media gay", but the fact that Rowling announced it once the books were done and dusted makes it feel a little disingenuous.

[–]ZveroboyAlinaclownfish is a clown or a fish? || Febfem 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, true. That's why I think it would be better if she did it mid way. That he was asexual is understandable, as he was this old.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Seem to recall that it wasn't actually retconning, though: the screen adaptations were going to depict Dumbledore as having once been in love with a woman, so Rowling just told them that wasn't possible, because he's gay. Which then got made public. But it sounds as though she was simply doing what the studio had hired her to do: keep the films at least reasonably faithful to the books. By not straightwashing a gay character, for example. And that seems perfectly fine to me. (Full disclosure: have never been much of a Potterhead myself.)

[–]kwallio 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When the book talked about his friendship to Grindelwald I 100% thought he was gay. When JK said that he was it was no surprise. If you read the books closely (especially book 7) it was obvious.