LesbianStonewall CEO tries to debunk "myth" of lesbian extinction using poll data and gets called out. "There were 3 lesbians [...] in that poll, Nancy. 3! Out of 1127"

submitted by motss-pb from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]julesburm1891 46 insightful - 5 fun46 insightful - 4 fun47 insightful - 5 fun -  (15 children)

Only attracted to the opposite sex

Mostly / only attracted to the same sex

Ffs, they didn’t even give an actual homosexual response option on this survey.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 27 insightful - 1 fun27 insightful - 0 fun28 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Because being homosexual is a hate crime nowadays, so we have to subliminally let people know that even though they said they're gay, they may be pan or whatever other fake stuff is out there

[–]hetisachoice 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Because being homosexual is a hate crime nowadays

What does that make heterosexuality?

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is also a hate crime, but the TQ+ crowd knows there are too many straights that will fight back and completely squash them in an instant. Not only are straights the majority by a large margin, but they have a lower brainwashing rate than LGB because no one can say that straights got their rights from transwomen of color, straights always had their rights. So if they go after the straights now, then the TRA movement would be destroyed.

[–]cutenoobies 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Oh they don't want to go against the heteros. They know they will get the flak for it.

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I think it's more that most of them are heterosexual themselves (even if they don't want to admit it), so why would they attack their fellow straight people? They can empathize with not being attracted to the same sex.

And the creepy homosexual transsexuals who really want straight men to fuck them actually put in the effort to pass convincingly enough as women to try and trick straight men into fucking them. They don't just sit around crying about it like transbians do.

[–]hetisachoice 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And the creepy homosexual transsexuals who really want straight men to fuck them actually put in the effort to pass convincingly enough as women to try and trick straight men into fucking them.

That is not heterosexuality by any stretch of the imagination.

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

...I never said it was? I was pointing out the difference between homosexual and heterosexual transsexuals. Het ones put little to no effort into passing and then attack gay people for not wanting them, while HSTS tend to try to be more stealthy about it. That's part of the reason why most of the aggression coming from the trans community is aimed at gay people and not straight people, in my opinion. That and there's just a lot more heterosexual trans people at this point, especially if you count enbies.

[–]hetisachoice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Then I'm black despite looking like God took Ricky Schroder and Barry Manilow and split the difference. Seriously, there is no ideologically coherent or scientifically sound position that rejects tr-nsracialism but not tr-nssexualism.

[–]TransspeciesUnicornI sexually identify as a mythical sparkly equine 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Uhhh did you mean to reply to me with that? Because I have no idea what you're talking about now.

[–]Taln_Reich 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Actually, I've got the survey rsults, and there was an actual homosexual response https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-06/ipsos-mori-lgbtq-polling-tables_260620_public.pdf (page 18)

The numbers given are, that 9% (48 respondents) of all men and 6% (36 respondents) of all women asked claimed to be only attracted to the same sex (6% (8 respondents) in genration z claimed same sex attraction only, page 19).

[–]LilianH 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

But page 20/21 list only 3 women who identify as lesbian.

[–]reluctant_commenter 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I dunno about other people, but where I live, I have heard someone who is herself lesbian suggest to me that we shouldn't be using that word. The lesbians are still there, although in low numbers; just, many may feel bad about calling themselves that.

[–]julesburm1891 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

...what did she suggest calling ourselves instead?

[–]reluctant_commenter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She calls herself gay usually. Which is not wrong if you take gay = homosexual I guess, but at least where I am at, many people treat "gay" as a continuum, they say "a little bit gay" or bisexual people will be like "oh yeah I'm so gay" even though they are bi. Not trying to bash bisexuals, though! It seems like gay erasure and bi erasure...

[–]julesburm1891 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you! This is interesting. I’m not really surprised to see that homosexual people are a small, but fairly constant figure across generation though.