I’ll admit it, I miss our Reddit community.

submitted by Smolders1Cock is god's greatest gift. from self.LGBDropTheT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]censorshipment 8 insightful - 5 fun8 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 5 fun -  (9 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstHateSubreddits/comments/gyyqem/open_letter_to_steve_huffman_and_the_board_of/

It was the open letter that a long list of left-wing subreddit moderators signed. But I think a lot of you would support AHS' mission to get FDS (FemaleDatingStrategy) banned for homophobia.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstHateSubreddits/comments/l4k3wd/rfds_gay_men_are_not_allies_they_dont_need_you/

I was banned from GenderCritical in 2019 for saying I don't give a fuck about gay men (nor bi men nor black men) as a (black) lesbian... I only care about women, black women in particular. I'm sure many of you would consider me a homophobic misandrist. Lol

[–]Smolders1Cock is god's greatest gift.[S] 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No, regardless of what their intent is, I don’t wanna support some janny task force’s mission to brigade subreddits, no matter what they’re doing it for. They literally set up VPN’s and make new accounts and then proceed to post child pornography to subreddits they don’t like.

[–]censorshipment 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

You know about that but many people don't. There are lots of straight women (libfems), women of color (libfems) and LGB folks helping AHS report subs. I've been talking about this for 7 months. The AskWomen and AskWomenOver30 sub mods, for example, are AHS allies of mostly "cis" women (libfems). I spent most of my time in "cis" women-centric subs and saw the hate for "terfs"/"transphobes". Seems to me that most TRAs are "cis" women. Ridiculous.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, a lot are actual women and I would be interested in a psychoanalysis of wtf is going on. I'm reminded of that story on Graham Linehan's site about all of those pregnant women in an online pregnancy support group rushing to coddle a trans-identifying male who was openly fetishizing pregnancy and supported his delusional fake pregnancy.

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

That's interesting considering that GenderCritical & related subs have banned me for simply being a male, banned women for supporting males in even the tiniest ways (as long as they're not "Homosexual Transsexuals" of course - gay creepy fetishists get a pass for some reason) and have been open about their blatant sexism, ableism, and general nastiness.

I'm also surprised FDS didn't go down with GC when it was banned because the two are very much alike.

[–]censorshipment 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

GC allowed males to participate which pissed off some female members who didn't want males there. The mods would tell women not to tell men they were not allowed since the GC mods never made that a rule. Men were welcomed as long as they followed the GC rules.

GC mods and FDS mods didn't even get along... iirc, one infamous FDS mod was banned from GC. GC members would often complain about the FDS term "pickme/pickmeisha" being used in the GC sub. FDS allows members to talk shit about ("low value") women whereas GC did not. Also, most FDS members are very gender conforming... they love femininity, fashion, etc. GC was not like that until the libfems and FDSers took over.

[–]Franklintheturtle 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

did GC really allow males to participate? I thought that was why GCGuys was created

[–]censorshipment 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

They sure did and would even warn women for "attacking" men commenting on GC posts. 2019 into 2020 was so odd. IIRC, there was even a mod post about being civil towards men. Mods also said men didn't have to indicate that they were men with flairs.

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The issue was that they never stated subs were "female only" and banned males anyway for simply posting a comment or two. Like itsafetish. They banned me for being male even though I was there for months, and being male was never in their rules. I believe they ACTUALLY banned me because I poked holes in their retarded "GAMP" theory, and said that it's pretty disrespectful to refer to androgynous people as GAMPs because not all of us are surgically induced fetishists. So I think they made up a fake "no guys allowed this is a women's sub!!" ban reason just so they could ban me for wrongthink, tbh.

I also disagree with that last part. I checked out FDS and a lot of them seemed to have every radfem ideas on gender - ie, any femininity bad, hygiene/shaving bad and oppressive, etcetc.

[–]akkordeonplayer 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

FDS had coverage in WSJ not long ago. I think one of their mods has connections to someone who writes for WSJ. If they were banned, it would definitely have a write up in at least that newspaper.