AL: Turns out dick can be great

submitted by blackrainbow from old.reddit.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Ladis_Wascheharuum 24 insightful - 27 fun24 insightful - 26 fun25 insightful - 27 fun -  (8 children)

Don't be a material fetishist. It doesn't matter if the dick is made of flesh or silicone, what matters is what pronouns it uses.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 12 insightful - 6 fun12 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 6 fun -  (6 children)

This is the correct conclusion.

The mistake is in the original syllogism:

A=B, B=C, but A != C. Thus "=" cannot be a transitive relation (which essentially violates the essential meaning of "=", or in Bill Clinton language "it depends on what the meaning of the word is is".)

However, this is in error because the A's, B's, and C's are not the same. A(mtf)=B(mtf), B(ftm)=C(ftm), but because A(mtf) != C(ftm), it is clear that B(mtf) cannot equal B(ftm). In other words, a silicone strap-on changes its essential nature depending on whether MtF or FtM is using it.

If you disagree you are not following the transgender science, bigot.

[–]blackrainbow[S] 17 insightful - 10 fun17 insightful - 9 fun18 insightful - 10 fun -  (5 children)

Don't use maths! It's a white suprematist construct!

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wait, wasn't algebra invented in the Islamic Golden Age?

[–]blackrainbow[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

yes, I was sarcastic

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Unfortunately, I wouldn't be surprised if there were people who would think that unironically simply because we use algebra so much in modern western schools

[–]diapason 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There are. I remember over the summer there were a bunch of Twitter users arguing over whether or not saying 2+2=4 is a universal truth was imperialist or not lmao

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

That's mathist against base 4 and lower number systems! sometimes 2+2=10!

[–]YoungHustle 10 insightful - 8 fun10 insightful - 7 fun11 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no my strap-on is non-binary. It wants me to pay for a bad haircut and thick glasses and call it Zander.