The many-coloured hair of "queer" straight people and their identities

submitted by ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah from youtube.com

all 13 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 38 insightful - 13 fun38 insightful - 12 fun39 insightful - 13 fun -  (4 children)

The bisexuals and trans people in this video are so annoying and pretentious! Being "fLeEWWIDdd" does not make you interesting as a person. It also does not make you deeper, smarter, more evolved, or self-aware than anyone else. Believing it does, makes you smug.

And wtf is up with the trans-identified female who says she "helps straight people understand their sexuality is not fixed"? Who the fuck died and made her king?

[–][deleted] 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Utterly vile human beings who lack the self-awareness to realise what they're saying, what they're attempting to do, and that not everyone's sexuality is 'fluid'.

Bleh. Disgusting people.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 23 insightful - 6 fun23 insightful - 5 fun24 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

not everyone's sexuality is 'fluid'.

God how I hate hate hate this fuckin' term! It's like fingernails on a blackboard to me at this point! "Fluid sexuality" MY ASS! Sounds like ya wanna shag a can of Mountain Dew or something!

HOW is this not just plain ol' bisexuality? Of the kind where your attraction to each sex waxes & wanes? Either that or you're (probably) straight people so into trendy-wokesterism that even primal pants-feelings have gotta be politically-correct. SOMEHOW. It's like vegan cats: SJW genitals!

They're hellbent on making sexual orientation so complicated that it requires a flow chart. But how could it be? There are only two sexes, so the possibilities for attraction must be limited to either or both. Why do they have a problem with this? It's like trying to treat a board game as three-dimensional chess when it's really just Candy Land.

Do these types strike anyone else as real-life Mary Sues? Forever demanding the spotlight, insufferably-SpecialTM in every way? They've even got the telltale Exotic Hair Color-itis!

[–]distortedlindsLady Muse 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

making sexual orientation so complicated that it requires a flow chart.

well said!!!

[–]just_lesbian_things 20 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Being "fLeEWWIDdd" does not make you interesting as a person

It makes them fickle and volatile, by definition. They can't say "I don't know what I will be in a year" AND "I am capable of being in a dedicated, long-term relationship". It's either or. There's a price to that level of "freedom". If you want to roleplay changing your sex or you don't think you'll be attracted to a certain sex in the future, then it stands to reason that you would be incompatible with someone who isn't going to change themselves to accommodate you. They can't reserve the right to completely re-invent themselves sexually and then get mad when people rule them out as potential partners for stable, long term relationships. That's the problem I have with fluid BTQ communities complaining about how nobody wants to be in a relationship with them.

[–]dilsencySame-sex community 21 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 1 fun22 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The trans spokesperson "enlightening" straight people that their ~sexuality isnt' fixed~. Ridiculous.

[–]BigMommyMilkersYes, they're real 19 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

“Queer” aka straight but looking for attention

[–]OPPRESSED_REPTILIANIntersex male | GNC | Don't call me "a gay", "twink" or "queen" 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Lmao @ the woman calling herself a "bottom"

Of all words for people to butcher and destroy the meaning of, at least they're doing it to a shitty word with a shitty meaning...? But still, that word probably doesn't mean what you think it does and I doubt you want to be seen as a "failed male with a useless cock that's a replacement girl and beneath other men", because... ew. Or maybe you do, I dunno. Either way... its not really a word that applies to women.

Also who the fuck mentions they're a "bottom sub" when asked their orientation anyway? Nobody asked.

Also, you ever notice that on these #woke series that keep popping up, they're always Americans, majority white? Nobody ever calls up someone like me, a homosexual depressed Russian, to come in to answer woke questions, for example, but... oh well I guess that's the point, anyone from outside the US would have very different viewpoints and well, we can't have that! Different opinions and cultural stances are B I G O T E D.

[–]reluctant_commenter 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Everything is malleable. Everything is shifting and changing. So who knows?!

Not this guy, clearly.

Guess I'm a bigot for not having an "open mind" about my sexuality changing. I'm just a boring gay person.