Disappointed in Vanessa Vokey

submitted by shinnygummy from self.GenderCritical

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]shinnygummy[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

It's not ~"propaganda"~ lefter. We're not leaving "mask world" until the virus is no longer a threat, and the longer you choose to be cowardly and selfish, the longer it will go on.

[–]lefterfield 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

So what's your plan, exactly? Kill or imprison the non-compliant? Freeze their bank accounts, prevent them from feeding their families?

[–]shinnygummy[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

What the fuck lol. You're a conspiracy theorist with a persecution complex. No, you complete buffoon, it's offensive to suggest that a holocaust is being perpetuated against you.

Mask and vaccine mandates will continue.

[–]lefterfield 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Why do you insist on making everything about me? I asked what YOU would do to the NON-COMPLIANT. Did I name myself as such? Is it any of your fucking business whether I have the vaccine or not? No. No, it is not.

Creepiest sentence you've said yet. You're an authoritarian, I get it.

[–]shinnygummy[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

It is my business because unvaccinated people are more contagious. I would simply not lift the mandates until there is no longer danger.

[–]lefterfield 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I'm genuinely curious what that means to you. Zero covid deaths anywhere? Is it some number of new cases?

[–]shinnygummy[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

Zero new covid cases.

[–]lefterfield 14 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Scientifically impossible. So you advocate permanent lockdowns and mask mandates. Why does it matter if anyone gets vaccinated or not, then?

[–]ghost_of_autumn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not only scientifically impossible but that reaction would not be proportionally reasonable considering how many regularly die from the flu.

Which, I may add, had vaccines made for it every single season for decades(that mostly didn't even prevent infection for those who took it). To this day though the number of new cases has never fallen anywhere close to zero. Because it's a disease that mutates fast- into many different variants that are resistant to the shot developed. It's a completely different sort of virus than those almost wiped out by vaccines; The ones people get immunized for as children and usually never need to again.

I think covid will also settle into being a permanently widespread endemic disease due to having very similar characteristics like this.

[–]shinnygummy[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Near zero. A threshold determined to be containable. I'm not that kind of scientist, so I'll let them determine it. Near the number of new cases we get for other diseases nearly eradicated by vaccines.

[–]lefterfield 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Sounds like you have no fucking clue what the threshold should be, nor comparable results for other diseases. Be nice if you could have been honest about that, hmm?

[–]TulipPoplar 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All mandates are enforced at gunpoint. Otherwise it is not a mandate.

[–]shinnygummy[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Then the current mask and vaccine mandates aren't mandates because they aren't enforced at gunpoint. Do you see the flaw in your logic?