you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GConly[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

This was waved around claiming it was as going to need the children's genitals to be inspected... Some are still bullshitting about this on this article.

Actual bill said a doctor's note/birth certificate would be sufficient.

[–]our_team_is_winning 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The birth certifcate part scares me now that 49 states, including Florida (only Tennessee hasn't yet) allow men to get new fake birth certificates claiming they were born female.

[–]Finaphoza 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay, but the doctor's note / birth certificate doesn't get people excited, so we can't talk about it.

[–]RationalNeutral 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you talking about this part?:

The earlier version of the bill, which passed the Florida House 77-40 on 14 April, contained a dispute resolution clause that would have allowed a school to inspect the genitals of any athlete subject to a complaint. The amended version of the bill passed by the Florida senate allowed scrutiny of a student’s birth certificate to suffice.

“We are told it’s a compromise because we’re no longer inspecting the genitals of children in schools,” the Democratic house representative Carlos Guillermo Smith, who identifies as LGBTQ, said on Wednesday during the house debate. “Members, not inspecting children’s genitals is not a compromise.”

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was real...