Japan court says ban on same-sex marriage constitutional by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know how the legal system works in Japan, but couldn't couples get around the inheritance issue with a written will?

I assume yes, but maybe other family members take precedence or can at least take it to court.

Log Cabin Republicans excluded from GOP convention by fudgemintday in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As much as I would like to see America's right wing (shit, even our left wing) lean further left, what did they expect? "Gay conservative" is a bit of an oxymoron.

31 Patriot Front members arrested near Idaho pride event by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I looked up "do people bring their kids to Mardi Gras" and there were a ton of responses urging people to, including this one: https://www.mardigrasneworleans.com/news/bring-your-kids-to-mardi-gras-yes

I have never been to one, but I'm gonna say based on this that yes, some people do bring their kids.

And there are a ton of kids at pop concerts for singers like Beyonce, Nicki Minaj, and Ariana Grande, or at rap shows with gogo dancers.

No bueno. Just saying there's a double standard in place.

Gender Critical Speech Soon To Be Banned in Canada by NoMorePatriarchy in censorship

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It actually isn't, if you read the bill. I'm American and I don't support hate speech laws at all. I think they're dystopian. However, calm and well-reasoned criticism of transsexualism will not be considered hate speech under this bill.

Bill C-261 full text

Definition of *hate speech*

(9) In this section, hate speech means the content of a communication that expresses detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.

Clarification – hate speech

(10) For greater certainty, the content of a communication does not express detestation or vilification, for the purposes of subsection (9), solely because it expresses mere dislike or disdain or it discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends.

The idea that someone can be arrested for something they post online, which isn't a direct threat of violence, is detestable to me. However, it's also important to keep in mind that this law does not apply to private communications.

We can criticize them without expressing "detestation or villification." I think we can all tell what parts of the "GC" movement would be forced to tone it down. There is a lot of detestation and villification of transsexuals online from "GC" people. In my opinion, expressing that is their right, and again, laws restricting free speech give me the chills. If I had it my way, I would veto the whole thing, yes, including the anti-racism parts.

However, it's silly to claim that now it will be impossible to criticize them or the ideology at all. I think most of the panic over this bill is from the type of "GC" "feminists" that give the rest of us a bad name. The kind of people who say all "TIMs" (trans-identified males, clarifying since this sub is on s/all) are just evil p3d0ph!l3s whose sole purpose in life is to r@p3 and generally subjugate women and girls. The people who think that this is a conspiracy by George Soros to oppress women and "TIMs" are his agents of evil. That kind of silly shit. You know how Karen Davis's fans harassed Arty Morty for daring to call out their hateful behavior and trying to find out why heterosexuals choose to transition (he deviated from their narrative which would answer that question with: because they're demons who hate women). Those people. Nothing Arty Morty himself has ever said would break this law.

Transsexualism is something that's done to homosexuals. Heterosexuals are now also choosing to transition, but historically, this has been an issue for homosexuals only. Homosexuals have been dealing with it for thousands of years. Now, some annoying heterosexual/bihet women want to jump in and say actually they're poor widdle victims and this is their problem and they're suffering so badly that they detest transsexuals... the transsexuals that they created through their participation in homophobic systems of action and thought... it's just ridiculous and it makes the rest of us look retarded and evil.

31 Patriot Front members arrested near Idaho pride event by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps we should all take weapons to a Mardi Gras event or a Nicki Minaj concert to protest heterosexual vulgarity.

31 Patriot Front members arrested near Idaho pride event by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bill to repeal Maryland sodomy law dies in committee by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A bill calling for repeal of a Maryland law that classifies oral sex between consenting adults as a crime and that was used to arrest four gay men in an adult video store in May 2021 was approved earlier this year by the state’s House of Delegates but died in a committee of the state Senate.

The law specifically bans oral sex and "unnatural or perverted sexual practice with another or with an animal,” however it's never enforced against heterosexuals.

The Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v Texas overturned laws like this one. However, after complaints of violation of the sodomy law (essentially "there are gays in my store"), the police chose to raid the store and break down the locked private rooms that can be rented to privately watch videos. These rooms are specifically for people to masturbate or hook up in privately. That is their purpose. These people were unlawfully arrested anyway and forced to spend the night in jail, however, and face criminal charges. Only one of the four is facing charges for indecent exposure, which indicates that they aren't even being accused of having sex in a public place (the rooms are private, locked, and meant for sexual activity anyway, but there could be an argument there, however flimsy). They are specifically attempting to regulate sexual acts done in private. More specifically, homosexual acts.

This case happened last year. This will get worse with the overturning of Roe, and the possible overturning of Lawrence. I can imagine homosexual couples' homes being raided on suspicion they are committing "sodomic" crimes, and having those police actions be completely legal.

edit: I also want to add that the above situation happened in 2021, so yes this law is still being enforced.

🏳️‍🌈 June 🏳️‍🌈 by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hell it's practically a law that you have to be a little gay now anyway....

What does this mean

SB 107: Trans Refuge Legislation | LGB Alliance USA by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But the feelings of people with HIV are so much more important than a person's right to not be willingly infected with a horrific disease. It hurts their feelings so bad when you tell them spreading disease is wrong. You HIV-phobe.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have to imagine it. Your kind are the majority of the population. I'm surrounded by people like that.

Do you believe in "biphobia"? by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think not all kinds of hate towards certain groups are deserving of a "phobia" label. That's how we got all the silly claims of things like "fatphobia" and "acephobia". If I irrationally hate all blondes, are we going to call it "blondephobia"?

I think the distinction between what gets to be a phobia and what doesn't is whether it's a real, active phenomenon in society. Can people hate bisexuals for reasons other than homophobia? Yes. Is it a widespread phenomenon like homophobia---which is a deep-seated issue in most people---deserving of its own name? Does it warrant specific study? I don't think so.

As far as lesbophobia, I think that homophobia just manifests differently when it's directed towards females than when it's directed towards males.

I read an interesting comment by a lesbian saying she used the word "lesbophobia" to describe the unique thing that lesbians face which she called "a mixture of homophobia and misogyny". But I think that "misogyny" is inherent in homophobia against females the way "misandry" is inherent in homophobia against males. Homophobia seems to me to be an issue of het/bihet people feeling like "ew, you aren't being a man/woman correctly". Some people would interpret the female version of that as misogyny, but to me, the different manifestations of homophobia, which I guess in this language scheme would be described as "gayphobia" and "lesbophobia" are two sides of the same coin.

s/LGBDropTheT has gone private. LGB Discussions is no longer a restricted sub. This is the place for open, intra-community discussion without overzealous moderation by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Honestly, it seems that the owners of the old sub just weren't that committed to having a place where we can have open discussion amongst ourselves.

Yes, I want to be able to talk about all things LGB here, even if they might be offensive. That includes drop the T of course.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Except you're cherry-picking. More recent polls put the numbers around 20-30%. But I guess those people "don't count" because they're "probably mentally ill or something" as if mental illness can change your sexuality. I have news for you. If you experienced a "change" in sexuality, you were never straight.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sexual orientation isn't a mental illness.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, only the users who admit to it. And yeah it's a decent portion of the world as well, but most people are only barely bi.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds good

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is already a replacement sub. s/LGB_Discussions

edit: It used to be restricted, but it's now open.

s/LGBDropTheT has gone private. LGB Discussions is no longer a restricted sub. This is the place for open, intra-community discussion without overzealous moderation by usehername in LGB_Discussions

[–]usehername[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

It's not clear. I guess there was a huge blowup over a simple disagreement? That's the rumor anyway.

Said disagreement; archived

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I guess I would be a "gold star" bisexual as I have never had sex with anyone trans.

What does this mean?

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're welcome to join my sub, Vulp. s/LGB_Discussions

It's for open discussion, not just rageposting and censorship.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No longer :)

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Alternative sub: s/LGB_Discussions

edit: Now open---no longer restricted.

/s/LGBDropTheT is private right now by cqtz in whatever

[–]usehername 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It flies under the radar, but I've spoken to the people who have been banned and you can see the patterns in her comments, especially her comments on s/bisexuals.

Selfie by AmericanMuskrat in pics

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

lmao

SOCKS IS BANNED. by JasonCarswell in news

[–]usehername 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just keeping the place Ed-free. :)

HUGE: Professor Wins $400,000 From University That Harassed Him Over Pronoun Use by [deleted] in news

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am not, nor have I ever claimed to be female, methward.

Trump calls for an end to ‘woke war on women' at North Carolina rally: Former president says 'far-left gender theories' are 'child abuse' and that public schools have replaced 'reading and math with pronouns and gender studies' by Chipit in politics

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes I'm sure Trump totally gives a shit about this and isn't just trying to rally support for his new campaign. And I'm sure that schools everywhere have done away with reading and math. lol

Jason surveys chat after a round of bans by HongKongPhooey in whatever

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Manlet seeths after being turned down by the young women he was stalking by jet199 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Consider this:

10 males, 10 females

Let's say each female has sex with 2 males. That means each male has had sex with 2 females. Their average is the same: 2.

Let's say all the females have sex with one male, while the rest of the males don't have sex.

Female sex: 1:1, 1:1, 1:1, 1:1, 1:1, 1:1, 1:1, 1:1, 1:1, 1:1

Female average = 1 * 10 = 10, 10 / 10 = 1

Male sex = 1:0, 1:0, 1:0, 1:0, 1:0, 1:0, 1:0, 1:0, 1:0, 1:10

Male average = 10 * 1 = 10, 10 / 10 = 1

You will find that no matter what numbers you put in, the averages are also the same. Because every time a man has sex (with a woman), a woman also has sex (with a man), so they each get a point.

Went from 123 post karma to 1276 in 4 hours by Brewdabier in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What techniques do you use?

Manlet seeths after being turned down by the young women he was stalking by jet199 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It is mathematically impossible for either men or women to have more sex when we are talking about heterosexuals. Every time a woman has sex she is having sex with a man, so a man is also having sex.

Do you support Putin's approaches in Ukraine? Yes or no? by [deleted] in AskSaidIt

[–]usehername 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Nay

Do you support Putin's approaches in Ukraine? Yes or no? by [deleted] in AskSaidIt

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 8 fun2 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Can we please get a response from u/yabbit

The hatred from the LGB SAIDIT MAFIA by sberry in whatever

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sadit, a free speech website where there is no censorship.

Not even m7 would argue that. Just check out the Pyramid of Debate.

The hatred from the LGB SAIDIT MAFIA by sberry in whatever

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not even a woman, he's just homophobic.

The hatred from the LGB SAIDIT MAFIA by sberry in whatever

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

edposting in progress

The hatred from the LGB SAIDIT MAFIA by sberry in whatever

[–]usehername 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is a misrepresentation. I never said gay people are women. I am sorry for being mean to you, Edward.

I’m Trying To Raise My Kids As Homosexuals (And I Never Even Have To Say ‘Gay’) by pcpmasterrace in SocialJusticeInAction

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's satire. Did you even read before posting? She openly says it's satire.

Am I being shadowbanned? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We can see your posts.

marxist child groomers in overdrive by aaarrgh in whatever

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

"not committing genocide against gay people is literally pedophilia!!!111!!!1!!11!!1!!!1"

This is pathetic.

Language, borders, and culture by BravoVictor in politics

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Is immigration really comparable to a literal wartime invasion with bombs, tanks, guns, etc.?

How to steal reddit content and monetize it? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yabbit. You need a real career in order to make good money.

What's the easiest and most valuable skill you can use to make money online? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

code.

Delusion by aaarrgh in whatever

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Power plants are a lot more efficient than a car engine.

Netflix Slammed With FOUR Felony Indictments Over 'Cuties' Movie by Tarrock in politics

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Okay. It was creepy but Dance Moms is way creepier and is actually real but is allowed to stay.

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

lmao

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Since POD is not enforced, there are technically fewer rules here.

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And there's some things you can talk about here that you can't talk about on reddit because that content is banned. lol

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Such as whom?

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then I'll spell it out for you. It's ironic because you're here on Saidit because snowflake mods banned you from reddit. Now you're acting like it's not a big deal? Why are you here then? Who cares?

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nooooo, a Mod on the interwebs bans people cause of hurtful words?

How ironic is this from a Saidit user?

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Posole by usehername in Cooking

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have never eaten hominy alone, but it sounds unpleasant lol. Food needs flavor. Glad you like it and if you try it, hope it comes out well. It is magical lol.

How old are you mfers? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

21

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Lol.

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He disagrees with some people's opinions so he bans them.

We Need to Talk About the Chat Operator Status by Jackalope in SaidIt

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

MANY folks agree, largely other voices that have earned the respect of our community.

Jack is a very respected user and here you are disparaging him for disagreeing with you. In fact, I've never seen anyone defend your conduct.

You're proving my point that when there is no power structure, someone will attempt to create an authoritarian one by force. And unfortunately, this time it's you.

We Need to Talk About the Chat Operator Status by Jackalope in SaidIt

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're a funny guy... except you're not joking.

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think we should enforce the POD in chat, but I do think that only obvious spam (ads, intentionally posting bullshit to clog up that chat that has no relevance, like the time our boy decided to post 99999999999 lines of code and everyone begged him to stop) should be banned. It really wouldn't even be necessary to set restrictions for chat ops if it wasn't for Jason's sad NEET "power" trip.

u/JasonCarswell, you're kicking over the sandcastle everyone's working on because someone added a shell you didn't like. Don't ruin the fun. It's just Saidit. It isn't real power, so how is it going to your head?

JasonCarswell regularly bans users in the Chat, breaking Saidit rules by [deleted] in SaidIt

[–]usehername 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

He bans people at the start with no provocation.

Sexy Manboobs by Jackalope in Boobs

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you so much for compiling this. I laughed my ass off.

How to get money online? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's down rn, wouldn't be that bad of a buy.

How to get money online? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

s/jumbasmoney you guys can beg together

Thank you for creating saidit.net by SlumSparrow in SaidIt

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

former admins 😔

How much money do you have? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Trades are in progress.

How much money do you have? by yabbit in Ask

[–]usehername 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Shitcoin is up.

"Free speech" is just a flimsy pretext here. This conversation is still visible in the #subscribed chat. by usehername in SaidIt

[–]usehername[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hmm I wonder why?

"Free speech" is just a flimsy pretext here. This conversation is still visible in the #subscribed chat. by usehername in SaidIt

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why do you think he's an AI?

"Free speech" is just a flimsy pretext here. This conversation is still visible in the #subscribed chat. by usehername in SaidIt

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

why?

"Free speech" is just a flimsy pretext here. This conversation is still visible in the #subscribed chat. by usehername in SaidIt

[–]usehername[S] 3 insightful - 6 fun3 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

When Jason says you're not valid 😔😔😔

"Free speech" is just a flimsy pretext here. This conversation is still visible in the #subscribed chat. by usehername in SaidIt

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At that point there were only 8 people in #subscribed. I wanted MORE to witness your bullshit.

Then why were you so grateful you had plausible deniability for the inevitable "authoritarian" accusations?

"Free speech" is just a flimsy pretext here. This conversation is still visible in the #subscribed chat. by usehername in SaidIt

[–]usehername[S] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Acting macho because I refuted your point. Logic was not sound and acting macho did not work :( try again.

"Free speech" is just a flimsy pretext here. This conversation is still visible in the #subscribed chat. by usehername in SaidIt

[–]usehername[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

If you continue to try to antagonize me I'll just ban you every chance I get and declare you an authoritarian enemy of free-thinking and truth-seeking, just as I have with others. I doubt you really want that.

Please you are so pathetic. Don't be a cancer to the site, Jason. And do you see your logical contradictions?:

I'll just ban you every chance I get

[I'll] declare you an authoritarian

Please do not humiliate yourself further. Look up some nice pastry recipes.