you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkTwainiac 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I agree with the poster on Mumsnet who said the point of these articles about uterus transplants in TIMs is to widen the Overton window so that in discussions about fertility the ability to bear and birth children will no longer be associated with being female. This is reflective of the new view that male people have a "human right" to acquire uteri and female gametes by any means possible in order to fulfill their dreams/desires of having children.

[–]ColoredTwice 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When abortion is not a women's right, but "people's right" it always ends up with males controling female biology. The "average human" is always malecentric entity, or it is sometging that affects both males and females - so solves zero issues. Similar happening with FGM and libfem parties, they are starting to discuss only issues that are "affecting both women and transwomen" - so they are not talking about women's issues at all.