all 8 comments

[–]eddyelric 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How frustrating. Does "same-sex attracted" work?

[–]ColoredTwice[S] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Only combination of letters "homos" is banned.

[–]BEB 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you also post this on s/LGBdroptheT?

I think posters there would be very interested that the word "homosexual" seems to be being erased by YouTube.

All these social media platforms are erasing and censoring words women and gays use to describe ourselves. Really sinister (I seem to use the word sinister frequently now, but it's the perfect word to describe what's happening around gender ideology)

[–]Marigold-plate 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh my... censoring language that’s integral to communicating the core of the LGB experience. I didn’t think this would happen. Interesting this happens as superstraight, supergay, superlesbian, and superbi become mainstream. I guess TRAs found a way to erase homosexuals in more ways than one. Conversion therapy for young gay children wasn’t enough.

[–]absoluteblasphemy 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[robot voice] there is no homosexual, there are only trans

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If the censor is based on homo, then does that mean that homophobia is also censored?

[–]ColoredTwice[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True.

[–]Marigold-plate 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a very good question. I’d like to know the answer to that too.